ArticleInternational journal of preventive medicine2019
Cervical Cancer Screening in Low Resource Settings: Cytology versus HPV Triage for VIA Positive Women.
Article in International journal of preventive medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Designing CITOBOT: A portable device for cervical cancer screening using human-centered design, smart prototyping, and artificial intelligence.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Cervical cancer screening and treatment for PLWHIV: experiences from an innovative program in Nigeria.Reproductive health · 2023Article
- AVIVA: a telehealth tool to improve cervical cancer screening in resource-constrained settings.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Effective High Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Case Finding in Low Resource Settings.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022Article
- Contribution of Tata Memorial Centre, India, to cervical cancer care: Journey of two decades.The Indian journal of medical research · 2021Review
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of high-risk human papilloma self-sampling test for cervical cancer screening in Bolivia.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of the study is to comparatively evaluate performance of human papillomavirus (HPV) hybrid capture 2 (HC2) and cytology as triage tests among visual inspection after application of 3-5% acetic acid (VIA) screen positive women, thus aiming to reduce the referral burden.
methodsThe community-based cross sectional cervical cancer screening with VIA was conducted among women aged between 30 and 65, residing in selected low socio-economic areas of Mumbai, India, during October 2010-March 2017. After obtaining informed consent, delivering health education and collecting socio-demographic data, participants were offered VIA screening by trained primary health workers. The VIA screen positive women underwent cytology, HPV HC2 and diagnostic colposcopy at nodal hospital. Women with positive colposcopy underwent cervical biopsies.
results231 VIA positive women underwent cytology and HPV HC2 test, followed by colposcopy. Cervical biopsies were obtained in 83 cases. The sensitivity and specificity in detecting ≥ CIN 2 were 77.8 and 92.3 for HC2 and 66.7 and 98.2 for cytology. The false positivity and negativity rates were 7.7 and 22.2 for HC2 and 1.8 and 33.3 for cytology.
conclusionsHPV HC2 reduces referrals to larger extent and misses fewer cases compared to cytology, thus appearing a better triage test among VIA positive women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.