Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31516470›Full record

ArticleTobacco induced diseases2018

The purchase sources of and price paid for cigarettes in six European countries: Findings from the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys.

Tibor Demjén, Judit Kiss, Piroska A Kovács, Ute Mons, Sarah Kahnert, Pete Driezen, Christina N Kyriakos, Mateusz Zatoński, Krzysztof Przewoźniak, Marcela Fu and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Tobacco Tax Increases: A Discourse Analysis of the French Print and Web News Media from 2000 to 2020.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Tibor DemjénSmoking or Health Hungarian Foundation (SHHF), Budapest, Hungary.
Judit KissSmoking or Health Hungarian Foundation (SHHF), Budapest, Hungary.
Piroska A KovácsSmoking or Health Hungarian Foundation (SHHF), Budapest, Hungary.
Ute MonsCancer Prevention Unit and WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Sarah KahnertCancer Prevention Unit and WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Pete DriezenDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo (UW), Waterloo, Canada.
Christina N KyriakosEuropean Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP), Brussels, Belgium.
Mateusz ZatońskiHealth Promotion Foundation (HPF), Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof PrzewoźniakHealth Promotion Foundation (HPF), Warsaw, Poland.
Marcela FuCatalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Esteve FernándezCatalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ann McNeillUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, King's College London (KCL), London, United Kingdom.
Marc WillemsenDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Yannis TountasNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens (UoA), Athens, Greece.
Antigona C TroforUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Grigore T. Popa' Iasi, Iasi, Romania.
Geoffrey T FongDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo (UW), Waterloo, Canada.
Constantine I VardavasEuropean Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP), Brussels, Belgium.
EUREST-PLUS consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTobacco tax policies have been proven to be effective in reducing tobacco consumption, but their impact can be mitigated through price-minimizing behaviours among smokers. This study explored the purchase sources of tobacco products and the price paid for tobacco products in six EU member states.

methodsData from Wave 1 of the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Survey collected from nationally representative samples of adult smokers in Germany, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Spain (ITC 6E Survey) were used. The ITC 6E Survey sample, conducted in 2016, randomly sampled 6011 adult cigarette smokers aged 18 years or older. Information on purchase sources of tobacco was examined by country. The difference in reported purchase price by purchase location (store vs non-store/other) was analysed using linear regression for each country.

resultsTobacco purchasing patterns and sources varied widely between countries. Non-store/other purchases were very rare in Hungary (0.1%) while these types of purchases were more common in Germany (5.1%) and Poland (8.6%). Reported prices of one standard pack of 20 cigarettes were highest in Germany (4.80€) and lowest in Hungary (2.45€). While non-store purchases were only made by a minority of smokers (>10% in all countries), the price differential was considerable between store and non-store/other sources, up to 2€ per pack in Greece and in Germany.

conclusionsThe results suggest a huge variation of purchasing sources and price differentials between store and non-store purchasing sources across the six EU member states examined. While the cross-sectional data precludes any causal inference, supply chain control through licensing as introduced in Hungary and the lack of such measures in the other countries might nevertheless be a plausible explanation for the large differences in the frequency of non-store purchases observed in this study.

Indexed as

price paid for tobaccopurchase sources of tobacco productsreducing the number of purchase sources

Identifiers

PMID31516470
PMCPMC6661972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.