Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31516464›Full record

ArticleTobacco induced diseases2018

Knowledge of the health risks of smoking and impact of cigarette warning labels among tobacco users in six European countries: Findings from the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys.

Antigona C Trofor, Sophia Papadakis, Lucia M Lotrean, Cornel Radu-Loghin, Marius Eremia, Florin Mihaltan, Pete Driezen, Christina N Kyriakos, Ute Mons, Tibor Demjén and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Awareness of Tobacco-Related Diseases among Adults in Poland: A 2022 Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Antigona C TroforUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy, 'Grigore T. Popa' Iasi, Iasi, Romania.
Sophia PapadakisUniversity of Crete (UoC), Heraklion, Greece.
Lucia M LotreanAer Pur România, București, România.
Cornel Radu-LoghinEuropean Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP), Brussels, Belgium.
Marius EremiaAer Pur România, București, România.
Florin MihaltanAer Pur România, București, România.
Pete DriezenDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo (UW), Waterloo, Canada.
Christina N KyriakosUniversity of Crete (UoC), Heraklion, Greece.
Ute MonsCancer Prevention Unit and WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Tibor DemjénSmoking or Health Hungarian Foundation (SHHF), Budapest, Hungary.
Sarah O NogueiraTobacco Control Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain.
Esteve FernándezTobacco Control Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain.
Yannis TountasNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens (UoA), Athens, Greece.
Krzysztof PrzewoźniakHealth Promotion Foundation (HPF), Warsaw, Poland.
Ann McNeillNational Addiction Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London (KCL), London, United Kingdom.
Geoffrey T FongDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo (UW), Waterloo, Canada.
Constantine I VardavasUniversity of Crete (UoC), Heraklion, Greece.
EUREST-PLUS consortium
European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention · BEHeidelberg University · DEHungarian Institute of Occupational Health · HUInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESInstitut Català d'Ornitologia · ESIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RONational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GROntario Institute for Cancer Research · CAThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLUK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies · GBUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to examine knowledge of health effects of smoking and the impact of cigarette package warnings among tobacco users from six European Union (EU) Member States (MS) immediately prior to the introduction of the EU Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) in 2016 and to explore the interrelationship between these two factors.

methodsCross-sectional data were collected via face-to-face interviews with adult smokers (n=6011) from six EU MS (Germany, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Spain) between June-September 2016. Sociodemographic variables and knowledge of health risks of smoking (KHR) were assessed. Warning salience, thoughts of harm, thoughts of quitting and foregoing of cigarettes as a result of health warnings were assessed. The Label Impact Index (LII) was used as a composite measure of warning effects. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to examine sociodemographic predictors of KHR and LII and the inter-relationship between knowledge and LII scores.

resultsThe KHR index was highest in Romania and Greece and lowest in Hungary and Germany. While the majority of smokers knew that smoking increases the risk for heart diseases, lung and throat cancer, there was lower awareness that tobacco use caused mouth cancer, pulmonary diseases, stroke, and there were very low levels of knowledge that it was also associated with impotence and blindness, in all six countries. Knowledge regarding the health risks of passive smoking was moderate in most countries. The LII was highest in Romania and Poland, followed by Spain and Greece, and lowest in Germany and Hungary. In almost all countries, there was a positive association between LII scores and higher KHR scores after controlling for sociodemographic variables. Several sociodemographic factors were associated with KHR and LII, with differences in these associations documented across countries.

conclusionsThese data provide evidence to support the need for stronger educational efforts and policies that can enhance the effectiveness of health warnings in communicating health risks and promoting quit attempts. Data will serve as a baseline for examining the impact of the TPD.

Indexed as

Europehealth effectshealth warningsITCtobacco use knowledge

Identifiers

PMID31516464
PMCPMC6661855
OpenAlexW2913443139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.