Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31516451›Full record

ArticleTobacco induced diseases2018

An exploratory analysis of adult daily smokers' experiences using e-cigarettes in smoke-free places.

Sabrina L Smiley, Elexis C Kierstead, Emily Harvey, Haneen Abudayyeh, Jennifer L Pearson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sabrina L SmileyDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States.
Elexis C KiersteadSchroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington, United States.
Emily HarveySchroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington, United States.
Haneen AbudayyehSchroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington, United States.
Jennifer L PearsonSchool of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, United States.

Funding

A Mixed Methods EMA Assessment of Cognition and Behavior among New ENDS UsersR21DA036472 · NIDA · TRUTH INITIATIVE FOUNDATION · PI PEARSON, JENNIFER LYNN · 2013 to 2014
$354k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA036472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEvidence indicates that one reason cigarette smokers value e-cigarettes is the ability to use them in places where smoking is not permitted. We sought to: 1) explore adult daily smokers' experiences using e-cigarettes in the context of smoke-free places; and 2) describe smokers' perceptions of bystanders' reactions.

methodsTwenty adult daily smokers in Washington, DC initiated e-cigarettes for three weeks and completed in semi-structured interviews at the end of each week. All interviews (n=60) were digitally-recorded, transcribed verbatim, imported into NVivo 10.0, and analyzed using thematic analysis methodology.

resultsThe sample had a mean age of 37.9 years and 18 participants reported having smoked their first cigarette by age 18. Common themes included descriptions of: 1) uncertainty about whether smoke-free policies included e-cigarettes; 2) using e-cigarettes in smoke-free places (e.g. restaurants, workplace, public transit-bus and rail); 3) approaches to e-cigarette use in smoke-free places as part of a complex decision-making process, ranging from testing and establishing the social and spatial boundaries of e-cigarette use, to confining e-cigarette use to inside their home; and 4) favorable, unfavorable, and impartial reactions from bystanders facilitated or impeded e-cigarette use, indicating social approval/social disapproval.

conclusionsResults suggest a continuum of factors, including smoke-free policies and reactions from bystanders may facilitate or impede e-cigarette use among smokers in environments where a smoke-free imperative is well-established. As e-cigarette use evolves, study findings indicate the importance of the social environment and how it could affect those switching from cigarettes to e-cigarettes.

Indexed as

cigarette smokerse-cigarettesqualitative studysmoke-free environments

Identifiers

PMID31516451
PMCPMC6659561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.