Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31516220›Full record

ReviewJournal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP

The World Health Organization classification of odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumors: An appraisal.

B Sivapathasundharam, Protyusha Guha Biswas, S Preethi

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Clinical analysis of the treatment of maxillary odontogenic cyst by nasal endoscope fenestration through nasal base].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023
    Article
  10. Cystic lesion between a deciduous tooth and the succeeding permanent tooth: a retrospective analysis of 87 cases.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Scientific reports · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Retrospective analysis of Desmoplastic Ameloblastoma: Clinical review.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2021
    Review
  17. Conservative Approach of a Dentigerous Cyst.Case reports in dentistry · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Eruption Cyst Treated with Diode Laser: A Case Report.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

B SivapathasundharamDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Faculty of Dentistry, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Protyusha Guha BiswasDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Faculty of Dentistry, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
S PreethiDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Faculty of Dentistry, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classification is the process of grouping similar entities under one category for the ease of their comprehension and better handling. Medical classification dates back to the days of William Farr who is credited with the development of a nosology, which later served as the forerunner for the modern-day disease classification by ICD. The WHO system of classification is a time-honoured system that has prevailed from decades together and is under constant evolution. The classification of odontogenic tumours was first formulated by Pierre Paul Broca and has undergone several transformations over years. Though the earlier classifications and their modifications by several authors and even by the WHO appeared to be fitting for their time, the latest edition of WHO classification of odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumours neither seems to be complete nor perfect, even at the present context. It is unfortunate that even with the advancement of molecular biology, the present WHO classification on Odontogenic and Maxillofacial bone tumours, fails to serve as a 'reference standard' in the true sense of the term. This article highlights the limitations of the current classification with constructive criticism that may help in further improvement.

Indexed as

Ameloblastomabone tumorsBrocamaxillofacial bone tumorsneoplasmsnonodontogenic cystsodontogenic cystsodontogenic keratocystodontogenic tumorsWorld Health Organization Classification

Identifiers

PMID31516220
PMCPMC6714253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.