Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31515854›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2020

Variation in Alcohol Policy Enforcement Across Urban and Nonurban Communities.

Collin Calvert, Traci Toomey, Kathleen Lenk, Spruha Joshi, Toben Nelson, Darin Erickson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Collin CalvertDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-1834-5245
Traci ToomeyDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Kathleen LenkDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Spruha JoshiDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Toben NelsonDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Darin EricksonDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Cancer Related Health Disparities Training ProgramT32CA163184 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MICHELE L ALLEN, Irina Stepanov · 2016 to 2026
$3.4M
A Comprehensive Analysis of State Alcohol Policy Environment and Its EffectsR01AA017873 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ERICKSON, DARIN · 2009 to 2012
$1.9M
Assessing How Local-Level Law Enforcement Strategies, Both Specific and in the Aggregate, Influence Binge Drinking and Alcohol-Impaired Driving in Communities Across the U.S.R21AA025370 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI TOOMEY, TRACI L · 2017 to 2018
$365k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA163184NCI NIH HHS T32CA163184NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017873NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA025370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe goal of this study was to assess whether different types of communities (ie, urban, suburban, small town, and rural) vary in the alcohol enforcement activities they conduct.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using data from a national survey of local law enforcement agencies. DATA: The survey assessed enforcement of a range of alcohol policies at 1,082 law enforcement agencies. U.S. Census data were used to categorize agencies based on community type.

resultsAgencies in urban areas conducted more enforcement activities than agencies in other community types. Urban agencies were more likely than rural agencies to conduct underage compliance checks (prevalence ratio [PR]: 0.42; CI: 0.34-0.53), saturation patrols (PR: 0.80; CI: 0.67-0.95), sobriety checkpoints (PR: 0.68; CI: 0.53-0.86), and enforcement aimed at illegal sales to intoxicated patrons (PR: 0.59; CI: 0.42-0.81). Urban agencies were also more likely than small town agencies to do compliance checks (PR: 0.66; CI: 0.56-0.79) and sobriety checkpoints (PR: 0.75; CI: 0.61-0.91), and they were more likely than suburban agencies to do compliance checks (PR: 0.67; CI: 0.57-0.78) and enforcement actions around the sale of alcohol to intoxicated patrons (PR: 0.64; CI: 0.45-0.90), provision of alcohol to minors (PR: 0.77; CI: 0.65-0.92), and consumption by minors (PR: 0.90; CI: 0.82-0.99).

conclusionsEnforcement of alcohol laws differs by community type. Future research is needed to identify mechanisms to increase enforcement by agencies in different types of communities.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingLaw EnforcementCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPolicySurveys and Questionnairesalcoholenforcementgeographypolicepolicy

Identifiers

PMID31515854
PMCPMC7065935
OpenAlexW2972622947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.