ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2020
Comparison of Scoring Systems in Predicting Severity and Prognosis of Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical usefulness of scoring systems to predict severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis with pre and post-test probability assessment.United European gastroenterology journal · 2023Pooled it
- The Diagnostic Value of Procalcitonin in Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Meta-Analysis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2022Pooled it
- Beyond triglyceride clearance: rethinking hypertriglyceridemia-associated acute pancreatitis in the apoC-III era.Gastroenterology report · 2026Review
- Clinical utility of the lactate-to-albumin ratio for predicting mortality in elderly severe acute pancreatitis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The association between inflammatory indices and acute pancreatitis severity: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Early prognostic value of the lactate-to-albumin ratio in severe acute pancreatitis with acute respiratory distress syndrome.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of an Early Severity Prediction Model for Hypertriglyceridemia-Associated Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting in-Hospital Progression in Initially Mild Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis Using Clinical and Non-Contrast CT Features.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Cumulative burden and dynamic trajectories of heart rate as predictors of prognosis in acute pancreatitis: an 18-year cohort study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- An explainable machine learning framework integrating clinical and lipidomic signatures for early severity stratification of hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- NLR and Platelet Dynamics: Simple, Cost-effective Biomarkers for Stratifying Severity in Acute Pancreatitis.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Clinical value of BISAP score combined with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and ascites in early prediction of hypertriglyceridemic severe acute pancreatitis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Liproxstatin-1 attenuates acute hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis through inhibiting ferroptosis in rats.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Neutrophil CD64 index as a new early predictive biomarker for infected pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Diabetes Mellitus on Moderately Severe Acute Pancreatitis and Severe Acute Pancreatitis.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Red cell distribution width: A predictor of the severity of hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis.World journal of experimental medicine · 2023Article
- Establishment and validation of early prediction model for hypertriglyceridemic severe acute pancreatitis.Lipids in health and disease · 2023Article
- Nonlinear Relationship Between Serum Total Cholesterol Levels and the Severity of Hypertriglyceridemic Acute Pancreatitis: A Cohort Study in China.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Predictive value of hyperglycemia on infection in critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Clinical Value of Hospital-Community-Family Integrated Nursing Model in the Treatment of Patients with Hyperlipidemia Pancreatitis.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn China, hyperlipidemia is the second major reason of acute pancreatitis.
aimsComparison of Scoring Systems in identification patients at risk for severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), pancreatic necrosis (PNec), and infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) early in the course of hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis (HTG-AP).
methodsPredictive accuracy of scoring systems was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in a retrospective study. Pairwise AUC comparisons were performed to calculate the difference between scoring systems.
resultsA total of 238 patients diagnosed with HTG-AP were included. Sixty patients (25.2%) were classified as SAP. Twenty-nine patients (12.2%) had evidence of PNec. Nine patients (3.8%) were diagnosed with IPN. One patient (0.4%) died during hospitalization. In predicting SAP in HTG-AP, the AUCs of APACHE-II, SOFA, SIRS, Ranson's, BISAP, and MMS were 0.77, 0.83, 0.73, 0.88, 0.83, and 0.85, respectively; in predicting PNec, were 0.75, 0.77, 0.75, 0.86, 0.80, and 0.75, respectively; and in predicting IPN, were 0.92, 0.86, 0.76, 0.85, 0.84, and 0.87, respectively. Pairwise AUC comparisons revealed that Ranson's, MMS, BISAP, and SOFA had higher accuracy than SIRS, Ranson's and MMS had higher accuracy than APACHE-II in predicting SAP; Ranson's had the same accuracy with BISAP, but higher than other four criteria in predicting PNec; APACHE-II had higher accuracy than SIRS in predicting IPN.
conclusionsAPACHE-II had high performance in predicting IPN, and all other score systems had medium performance in predicting SAP, PNec, and IPN in HTG-AP. Each score has its merit and weakness; BISAP may be the best criterion in predicting severity and prognosis of HTG-AP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.