ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019
Dispersion characterization of magnetic actuated needleless injections with particle image velocimetry.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional needle-based approaches in intravitreal drug delivery carry needle-stick-injury risk and could scare patients (belonephobia). Alternatively, our group has explored the application of an electromagnetic needleless injector in this paper. This work aims to improve intravitreal drug delivery, which in the future could assist physicians with automation and benefit patients by providing a needleless approach. Electromagnetic needleless intravitreal injections lack quantification studies. We investigate the delivery properties of the needleless injector where the characterization can be used to refine the design parameters of the prototype in subsequent iterations. Experiments were performed to characterize the injectant delivered from the electromagnetic needleless injector. Penetration tests were conducted to observe the influences of various injection barriers and tissues. Ultrasonic imaging modality was explored for future applications of the prototype. The dispersion of the injectant was controllable where injection depth and distribution is dependent on the input voltage. The synthetic barriers highlighted significant energy losses for penetration (maximum velocity falls from 4.46 to 1.57 mm/s with a 0.1-mm barrier). The biological barriers were difficult to penetrate with the current prototype. Our results indicate that the current electromagnetic injector offers controllable dispersion (depth and distribution) correlated with input voltages, which should have increased injection power for use with biological tissue. Ultrasonic imaging modality produced velocity profiles comparable to the optical approach which is promising for future in vivo studies. The influences of injection barriers should be further investigated in in vivo experiments with ultrasonic imaging modalities. Graphical abstract .
Indexed as
Identifiers
31515659What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.