ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2020
Frequency dependence of attenuation and backscatter coefficient of ex vivo human lymphedema dermis.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Attenuation Estimation and Acoustic Characterization of Mouse Lymph Node Tumor Using High-frequency Ultrasound.Molecular imaging and biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRadio-frequency (RF) signals from the most dominant scatterer in a dermis, i.e., collagen fibers, are collected as backscattered signals. We aim to confirm the frequency dependence of the spatial distribution of features in ultrasound images, as well as the attenuation coefficient (AC) and backscatter coefficient (BSC) of skin tissue without [LE (-)] and with lymphedema [LE (+)].
methodsMeasurement samples (n = 13) were excised from human skin tissue with LE (-) and middle severity LE (+). A laboratory-made scanner and single-element concave transducers (range 9-47 MHz) were used to measure RF data. A localized AC was computed from the normalized power spectrum using the linear least squares technique. The reflector method and compensation technique of the attenuation of tissue were applied to calculate the BSC. In addition, effective scatterer diameter (ESD), effective acoustic concentration (EAC), and integrated BSC (IBS) were calculated from the BSC as the benchmark to differentiate LE (-) and LE (+) tissues.
resultsHigh-frequency ultrasound displayed different echogenicity and texture compared between LE (-) and LE (+) in all transducers. The AC for LE (-) (0.22 dB/mm/MHz) and LE (+) (0.29 dB/mm/MHz) was comparable. BSC in LE (-) and LE (+) increased linearly with each transducer. The difference of intercept of the BSC between LE (-) and LE (+) indicated that both EAC and IBS of LE (+) were higher than that of LE (-). In contrast, ESD correlated with the slope of the BSC demonstrated the same tendency for both LE (-) and LE (+). These tendencies appeared for each transducer independent of the frequency bandwidth.
conclusionFrequency independence of AC and BSC in LE (-) and LE (+) was confirmed. Several 9- to 19-MHz ultrasound beams are sufficient for BSC analysis to discriminate LE (-) and LE (+) in terms of the penetration depth of the ultrasound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31515646What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.