Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31515594›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2020

External fixators: looking beyond the hardware maze.

Kimia Khalatbari Kani, Jack A Porrino, Felix S Chew

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Innovative approach to distraction osteogenesis using a novel external fixator design. In vivo experimental rabbit model.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  4. [Biocompatibility of 3D printed biodegradable WE43 magnesium alloy scaffolds and treatment of bone defects].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Use of external fixators in developing countries: a short socioeconomic analysis.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. An engineering review of external fixators.Medical engineering & physics · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kimia Khalatbari KaniDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. khalatbarik@live.com.
Jack A PorrinoRadiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520-8042, USA.
Felix S ChewDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Washington · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

External fixation has a wide variety of orthopedic applications. Although external fixator frames may have a complex appearance, these constructs are formed from several basic components and can be broadly categorized into unilateral, circular, or hybrid designs. The introduction of computer-aided circular external fixation devices (hexapod frames) has simplified the treatment of multiaxial and especially rotational deformities. Serial radiography plays a central role in the evaluation of callus formation (at the level of treated fracture or nonunion as well as the regenerate and docking site with distraction osteogenesis), tailoring the rate and rhythm of distraction during distraction osteogenesis, evaluation of frame complications, and determination of the timing of frame removal. The goals of this article are to review: the components, types, and relevant terminology of external fixator constructs with special emphasis on the Taylor spatial frame, the principles and techniques of distraction osteogenesis, and complications of external fixation.

Indexed as

External FixatorsProsthesis DesignBone DiseasesHumansOrthopedicsBone lengtheningBone transportDistraction osteogenesisExternal fixatorHexapod framesIlizarov frameRing fixatorTaylor spatial frameUnilateral frames

Identifiers

PMID31515594
OpenAlexW2972563286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.