Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31515573›Full record

SynthesisUrolithiasis2020

Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and risk of urolithiasis: results of a genetic epidemiology study and comprehensive meta-analysis.

Ali Amar, Ayesha Afzal, Syed Atif Hussain, Athar Hameed, Abdul Rafay Khan, Madiha Shakoor, Aiysha Abid, Shagufta Khaliq

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Urolithiasis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ali AmarDepartment of Human Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of Health Sciences, Khayaban-e-Jamia Punjab, Lahore, 54600, Pakistan.
Ayesha AfzalDepartment of Human Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of Health Sciences, Khayaban-e-Jamia Punjab, Lahore, 54600, Pakistan.
Syed Atif HussainDepartment of Urology, Sheikh Zayed Medical College Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.
Athar HameedDepartment of Urology, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Abdul Rafay KhanCentre for Human Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan.
Madiha ShakoorDepartment of Human Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of Health Sciences, Khayaban-e-Jamia Punjab, Lahore, 54600, Pakistan.
Aiysha AbidCentre for Human Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shagufta KhaliqDepartment of Human Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of Health Sciences, Khayaban-e-Jamia Punjab, Lahore, 54600, Pakistan. khaliq.shagufta@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-3969

Funding

Higher Education Commission, Pakistan NRPU#1987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymorphisms of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene have been associated with risk of urolithiasis, but, with inconsistent results and lack data from Pakistani population. Therefore, after including our indigenous study data, a comprehensive meta-analysis was performed to provide an evidence-based estimate of any association between VDR polymorphisms and urolithiasis risk. A total of 483 Pakistani subjects, comprising 235 urolithiasis patients and 248 healthy controls, were genotyped for 6 VDR polymorphisms. Additionally, a systematic literature search with subsequent meta-analysis was conducted and pooled odds ratios (ORs) were used to determine the strength of any existent associations. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was also performed. Results revealed no significant association of any VDR polymorphism and urolithiasis risk in indigenous Pakistani patients. However, meta-analysis of 29 relevant studies indicated that VDR FokI polymorphism significantly increased the risk of urolithiasis in allelic (f vs. F: OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.05-1.22; p ≤ 0.01) and recessive (ff vs. FF + Ff: OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.05-1.38; p = 0.01) models with no significant heterogeneity. No associations were evident for VDR ApaI, BsmI and TaqI polymorphic variants and urolithiasis risk after correction for multiple testing. Subgroup analysis by ethnicity suggested significant association for FokI variant among Asians. The TSA results demonstrated that the evidence reflecting association of FokI polymorphism and urolithiasis risk was sufficient and conclusive. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that VDR FokI polymorphism is significantly associated with urolithiasis risk, especially in Asians, whereas ApaI, BsmI and TaqI polymorphisms are not associated.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideHumansMolecular EpidemiologyReceptors, CalcitriolRisk FactorsUrolithiasisReceptors, CalcitriolVDR protein, humanCase–controlPakistanRenal stonesSNPVDR

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.