Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31515570›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2019

Prognosticators of Long-Term Outcomes of TNM Stage II Colorectal Cancer: Molecular Patterns or Clinicopathological Features.

Tai-Chuan Kuan, Shih-Ching Chang, Jen-Kou Lin, Tzu-Chen Lin, Shung-Haur Yang, Jeng-Kae Jiang, Wei-Shone Chen, Huann-Sheng Wang, Yuan-Tzu Lan, Chun-Chi Lin and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tai-Chuan KuanDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2., Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.
Shih-Ching ChangDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2., Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan. changsc@vghtpe.gov.tw.
Jen-Kou LinDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2., Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.
Tzu-Chen LinDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2., Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.
Shung-Haur YangDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2., Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.
Jeng-Kae JiangDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2., Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.
Wei-Shone ChenDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2., Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.
Huann-Sheng WangDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2., Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.
Yuan-Tzu LanDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2., Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.
Chun-Chi LinDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2., Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.
Hung-Hsin LinDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2., Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.
Sheng-Chieh HuangDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2., Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) have a higher risk of recurrence when they have certain risk factors, including clinical and pathological patterns. However, as the prognostic role of molecular patterns for stage II disease is still unclear, this study aimed to investigate it.

methodsA total of 509 patients with stage II CRC were enrolled, and all clinical, pathological, and molecular data were collected. Molecular patterns included microsatellite instability (MSI); elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotides (EMAST) status; and expression of RAS/RAF genes, genes of the APC pathway, and other gene mutations. The endpoints were oncological outcomes, including overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence (LR), and distant recurrence (DR). Cox regression analysis was used.

resultsNumerous molecular patterns influenced the oncological outcomes on univariate analysis, but no variable reached significance in LR. On multivariate analysis, a mucinous component (MC) > 50% (P < 0.01) was significant for OS and CSS. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI; P< 0.01), MC > 50% (P < 0.01), and EMAST-H (P = 0.02) significantly influenced DFS, whereas LVI (P < 0.01), MC > 50% (P < 0.01), and TP53 mutation (P = 0.02) were significant for DR.

conclusionsIn this study, MSI, EMAST, and RAS/RAF alterations did not influence the oncological outcomes. Overall, LVI and MC were two significant prognostic factors for DFS and DR. Thus, the histopathology, rather than the genes, plays a major role in the prognosis of patients with stage II CRC.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMicrosatellite RepeatsMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.