ReviewDer Radiologe2019
[Neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach, duodenum and pancreas : Value of (hybrid) radiological diagnostics].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Ultrasound and Gastric Sub-Epithelial Lesions: Ultrasonographic Features, Tissue Acquisition Strategies, and Therapeutic Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- EUS-Guided Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions, What Is New?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical/methodical issueNeuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the stomach, duodenum and pancreas are rare tumors with a low incidence but the exact tumor localization and staging diagnostics are of critical importance for further planning of treatment. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsStandard primary diagnostic methods include multimodal imaging with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) but in 20-50% of the cases the localization of the primary tumor cannot be identified. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Modern hybrid imaging procedures combine radiological procedures and functional imaging, e.g. using somatostatin receptor (SSR) positron emission tomography CT (PET)/CT imaging. For the exact diagnostics of the primary tumor and distant metastases morphological and functional aspects can be combined for targeted diagnostics. For primary tumor staging a sensitivity of 80.0% and a specificity of 88.4% are given in the literature. PERFORMANCE: The application of SSR PET/CT led to a change in patient management in 44% of all cases according to a recently published meta-analysis and therefore had a significant influence on the further procedure. ASSESSMENT: The use of SSR PET/CT can provide critical information for further treatment and can lead to a significant change in treatment management in a relevant proportion of patients. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Radiological imaging diagnostics and in particular hybrid functional imaging procedures using PET/CT will become increasingly more relevant for the diagnostics, treatment and follow-up of NET patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31515568What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.