Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31515540›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2019

Transposable elements in human genetic disease.

Lindsay M Payer, Kathleen H Burns

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 225 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
225citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
49.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

225 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 365 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. LINE-1 Retrotransposons and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Sea CucumberResearch square · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

165 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lindsay M PayerDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kathleen H BurnsDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. kburns@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1620-3761
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposable elements are abundant in the human genome, and great strides have been made in pinpointing variations in these repetitive sequences using whole-genome sequencing. Now, the focus is shifting to understanding their expression and regulation, and the functional consequences of their insertion and retention in the genome over time. Whereas transposable element insertions have been known to cause human genetic disease since the 1980s, the scope of their contributions to heritable phenotypes is now starting to be uncovered. Here, we review the many ways human retrotransposons contribute to genome function, their dysregulation in diseases including cancer and how they affect genetic disease.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularHuman GeneticsRetroelementsGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansNeoplasmsRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID31515540
OpenAlexW2973090451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.