Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31515053›Full record

ReviewTrends in cardiovascular medicine2020

Cardiac regenerative therapy: Many paths to repair.

Natalie A Gude, Mark A Sussman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cardiovascular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. c-kitStem cell reviews and reports · 2023
    Article
  8. Transient reprogramming primes the heart for repair.The journal of cardiovascular aging · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalie A GudeSDSU Heart Institute and Biology Department, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.
Mark A SussmanSDSU Heart Institute and Biology Department, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182, USA. Electronic address: heartman4ever@icloud.com.
San Diego State University · US

Funding

Surgery, Physiology and ImmunohistopathologyP01HL085577 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GLEMBOTSKI, CHRIS · 2006 to 2017
$18.4M
Regulation of Signal Transduction to Treat Heart FailureR01HL067245 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SUSSMAN, MARK ALAN · 2001 to 2021
$6.0M
Stem Cell Signaling in the Pathologically Challenged MyocardiumR37HL091102 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SUSSMAN, MARK ALAN · 2008 to 2017
$3.8M
Antagonism of myocardial aging and senescence with Pim-1 kinaseR01HL105759 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SUSSMAN, MARK ALAN · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
Resolving myocardial regeneration by tracking commitment of c-Kit+ cellsR01HL135661 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GUDE, NATALIE ALLEN, SUSSMAN, MARK ALAN · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
Molecular Engineering of Damaged Myocardium To Enhance Regeneration And RepairR01HL113656 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SUSSMAN, MARK ALAN · 2012 to 2013
$667k
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL085577NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL067245NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105759NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113656NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL135661NHLBI NIH HHS R37 HL091102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease remains the primary cause of death in the United States and in most nations worldwide, despite ongoing intensive efforts to promote cardiac health and treat heart failure. Replacing damaged myocardium represents perhaps the most promising treatment strategy, but also the most challenging given that the adult mammalian heart is notoriously resistant to endogenous repair. Cardiac regeneration following pathologic challenge would require proliferation of surviving tissue, expansion and differentiation of resident progenitors, or transdifferentiation of exogenously applied progenitor cells into functioning myocardium. Adult cardiomyocyte proliferation has been the focus of investigation for decades, recently enjoying a renaissance of interest as a therapeutic strategy for reversing cardiomyocyte loss due in large part to ongoing controversies and frustrations with myocardial cell therapy outcomes. The promise of cardiac cell therapy originated with reports of resident adult cardiac stem cells that could be isolated, expanded and reintroduced into damaged myocardium, producing beneficial effects in preclinical animal models. Despite modest functional improvements, Phase I clinical trials using autologous cardiac derived cells have proven safe and effective, setting the stage for an ongoing multi-center Phase II trial combining autologous cardiac stem cell types to enhance beneficial effects. This overview will examine the history of these two approaches for promoting cardiac repair and attempt to provide context for current and future directions in cardiac regenerative research.

Indexed as

RegenerationStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCellular SenescenceHeart DiseasesHumansMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacPhenotypeRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeCardiac repairCardiac stem cellCardiomyocyteRegenerative therapy

Identifiers

PMID31515053
PMCPMC7050404
OpenAlexW2971430132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.