ArticleBiophysical journal2019
Restitution and Stability of Human Ventricular Action Potential at High and Variable Pacing Rate.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The electrical restitution of the non-propagated cardiac ventricular action potential.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2024Review
- Ventricular Repolarization and Calcium Transient Show Resonant Behavior under Oscillatory Pacing Rate.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Arrhythmogenic Mechanisms in Hypokalaemia: Insights From Pre-clinical Models.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Electrical Restitution and Its Modifications by Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Undiseased Human Ventricular Muscle.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- The Heart by Numbers.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the key role of beat-to-beat action potential (AP) variability in the onset of ventricular arrhythmias at high pacing rate, the knowledge of the involved dynamics and of effective prognostic parameters is largely incomplete. Electrical restitution (ER), the way AP duration (APD) senses changes in preceding cycle length (CL), has been used to monitor transition to arrhythmias. The use of standard ER (sER), though, is controversial, not always suitable for in vivo and only rarely for clinical applications. By means of simulations on a human ventricular AP model, I investigate the dynamics of APD at high pacing rate under sinusoidally, saw-tooth, and randomly variable pacing CLs. AP sequences were compared in terms of beat-to-beat restitution (btb-ER) and of the collections of sER curves generated from each beat. A definition of APD stability is also proposed, based on successive APD changes introduced in an AP sequence by a premature beat. The explored CL range includes values leading to APD alternans under constant pacing. Three different types of response to CL variability were found, corresponding to progressively higher rate of beat-to-beat CL changes. Low rates (∼1 ms/beat) generate a btb-ER dominated by steady-state rate dependence of APD (type 1), intermediate rates (∼5 ms/beat) lead to a btb-ER similar to a single sER (type 2), and high rates (∼20 ms/beat) to hysteretic btb-ER under periodic pacing and to a vertically spread btb-ER in the case of random pacing (type 3). Stability of AP repolarization always increases with the rate of CL changes. Thus, rather than looking at sER slope, which requires additional interventions during the recording of cardiac electrical activity, this study provides rationale for the use of btb-ER representations as predictors of repolarization stability under extreme pacing conditions, known to be critical for the arrhythmia development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.