Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31514352›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019

Probiotics for the Prophylaxis of Migraine: A Systematic Review of Randomized Placebo Controlled Trials.

Malwina M Naghibi, Richard Day, Samantha Stone, Ashton Harper

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04696458 (Effects of a Multispecies Probiotic on Migraine), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04696458 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effects of a Multispecies Probiotic on Migraine: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorScripps HealthRan2021 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsMigraine, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Headache, MigraineArmsLactobacillus plantarum (CECT7484 and CECT7485)/ Pediococcus acidilactici (CECT7483), Placebo Comparator: Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Bidirectional View of Migraine and Diet Relationship.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2021
    Review
  12. Migraine and Diet.Nutrients · 2020
    Review
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Malwina M NaghibiADM Protexin, Lopen Head TA13 5JH, UK. malwina.naghibi@adm.com.
Richard DayADM Protexin, Lopen Head TA13 5JH, UK. richard.day@adm.com.
Samantha StoneADM Protexin, Lopen Head TA13 5JH, UK. samantha.stone@adm.com.
Ashton HarperADM Protexin, Lopen Head TA13 5JH, UK. ashton.harper@adm.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4360-1629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine is a common and disabling neurological condition with a complex etiology. Recent advances in the understanding of the gut microbiome have shown the role of gut micro-organisms in disease outcomes for distant organs-including the brain. Interventions targeting the gut microbiome have been shown to be effective in multiple neurological diagnoses, but there is little research into the role of the microbiome in migraine. This systematic review seeks to assess the current research landscape of randomized placebo controlled trials utilizing probiotic interventions as migraine prophylaxis. Searches were conducted of scientific databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library, following PRISMA guidelines. Of 68 screened studies, 2 were eligible for analysis. Due to methodological differences, meta-analysis was not possible. Qualitative comparison of the studies demonstrated a dichotomy of results-one trial reported no significant change in migraine frequency and intensity, while the second trial reported highly significant improvements. No clear 'gold standard' currently exists for microbiome research, let alone for migraine-related microbiome research. The heterogeneity of outcome measures used in the two trials included in this systematic review shows the need for a standardization of outcome measures, therefore a series of recommendations for future probiotic-migraine research are included.

Indexed as

gut–brain axismigraineprobioticsprophylaxissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31514352
PMCPMC6780403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.