Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31514327›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Collaborative Workshops for Community Meaning-Making and Data Analyses: How Focus Groups Strengthen Data by Enhancing Understanding and Promoting Use.

Barbara L Allen, Johanna Lees, Alison K Cohen, Maxime Jeanjean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Barbara L AllenDepartment of Science, Technology and Society, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 22043, USA. ballen@vt.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8200-2066
Johanna LeesCentre Norbert Elias (UMR 85 62), Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales, 13236 Marseille, France. leesjohanna@gmail.com.
Alison K CohenDepartment of Public and Nonprofit Administration, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94117, USA. akcohen@usfca.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9848-934X
Maxime JeanjeanCentre Norbert Elias (UMR 85 62), Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales, 13236 Marseille, France. max.jeanjean@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-based participatory research is a growing approach, but often includes higher levels of community engagement in the research design and data collection stages than in the data interpretation stage. Involving study participants in this stage could further knowledge justice, science that aligns with and supports social justice agendas. This article reports on two community-based participatory environmental health surveys conducted between 2015 and 2019 in an industrial region near Marseille, France, and focuses specifically on our approach of organizing focus groups to directly involve residents and community stakeholders in the analysis and interpretation process. We found that, in these focus groups, residents triangulated across many different sources of information-study findings, local knowledge, and different types of expert knowledge-to reach conclusions about the health of their community and make recommendations for what should be done to improve community health outcomes. We conclude that involving residents in the data analysis and interpretation stage can promote epistemic justice and lead to final reports that are more useful to community stakeholders and decision-makers.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchData Interpretation, StatisticalEnvironmental HealthFocus GroupsAsthmaDecision MakingFranceHumansKnowledgeNeoplasmsSocial JusticeSurveys and Questionnairescommunity-based participatory researchdata interpretationenvironmental healthknowledge justiceparticipatory sciencepublic health

Identifiers

PMID31514327
PMCPMC6765948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.