Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31514289›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Fabrication and Biocompatibility Evaluation of Nanodiamonds-Gelatin Electrospun Materials Designed for Prospective Tissue Regeneration Applications.

Aida Şelaru, Diana-Maria Drăgușin, Elena Olăreț, Andrada Serafim, Doris Steinmüller-Nethl, Eugeniu Vasile, Horia Iovu, Izabela-Cristina Stancu, Marieta Costache, Sorina Dinescu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aida ŞelaruDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Bucharest, 050095 Bucharest, Romania. aida.selaru@bio.unibuc.ro.ORCID 0000-0001-8587-1574
Diana-Maria DrăgușinAdvanced Polymer Materials Group, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania. diana.dragusin@upb.ro.
Elena OlărețAdvanced Polymer Materials Group, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania. elena.olaret@stud.fim.upb.ro.
Andrada SerafimAdvanced Polymer Materials Group, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania. andrada.serafim@gmail.com.
Doris Steinmüller-NethlDiaCoating. GmbH, 6112 Wattens, Austria. doris.steinmueller@diacoating.com.
Eugeniu VasileDepartment of Science and Engineering of Oxide Materials and Nanomaterials, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania. eugeniu.vasile@upb.ro.
Horia IovuAdvanced Polymer Materials Group, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania. horia.iovu@upb.ro.
Izabela-Cristina StancuAdvanced Polymer Materials Group, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania. izabela.stancu@upb.ro.
Marieta CostacheDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Bucharest, 050095 Bucharest, Romania. marieta.costache@bio.unibuc.ro.
Sorina DinescuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Bucharest, 050095 Bucharest, Romania. sorina.dinescu@bio.unibuc.ro.ORCID 0000-0001-7196-1712
Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București · ROUniversity of Bucharest · RO

Funding

European Regional Development Fund through Competitiveness Operational Program 2014-2020, Priority axis 1 P_36_611, MySMIS code 107066, Innovative Technologies for Materials Quality Assurance in Health, Energy and Environmental - Center for Innovative Manufacturing Solutions of Smart Biomaterials and Biomedical Surfaces - INOVABIOMEDRomanian Ministry of Research and Innovation, CCCDI-UEFISCDI PN-III-P1-1.2-PCCDI-2017-0782/REGMED
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the reduced ability of most harmed tissues to self-regenerate, new strategies are being developed in order to promote self-repair assisted or not by biomaterials, among these tissue engineering (TE). Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hASCs) currently represent a promising tool for tissue reconstruction, due to their low immunogenicity, high differentiation potential to multiple cell types and easy harvesting. Gelatin is a natural biocompatible polymer used for regenerative applications, while nanodiamond particles (NDs) are used as reinforcing nanomaterial that might modulate cell behavior, namely cell adhesion, viability, and proliferation. The development of electrospun microfibers loaded with NDs is expected to allow nanomechanical sensing due to local modifications of both nanostructure and stiffness. Two aqueous suspensions with 0.5 and 1% w/v NDs in gelatin from cold water fish skin (FG) were used to generate electrospun meshes. Advanced morpho- and micro-structural characterization revealed homogeneous microfibers. Nanoindentation tests confirmed the reinforcing effect of NDs. Biocompatibility assays showed an increased viability and proliferation profile of hASCs in contact with FG_NDs, correlated with very low cytotoxic effects of the materials. Moreover, hASCs developed an elongated cytoskeleton, suggesting that NDs addition to FG materials encouraged cell adhesion. This study showed the FG_NDs fibrous scaffolds potential for advanced TE applications.

Indexed as

adipose-derived stem cellsbiocompatibilitydiamond nanoparticlesfish gelatintissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID31514289
PMCPMC6766245
OpenAlexW2973042792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.