Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31514287›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Influence of Sampling Conditions, Salivary Flow, and Total Protein Content in Uric Acid Measurements in Saliva.

Jorge M González-Hernández, Lorena Franco, David Colomer-Poveda, Silvia Martinez-Subiela, Ramón Cugat, José J Cerón, Gonzalo Márquez, Luis M Martínez-Aranda, Pedro Jimenez-Reyes, Asta Tvarijonaviciute

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Label-Free Metal-Oxide Transistor Biosensors for Metabolite Detection in Human Saliva.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jorge M González-HernándezNeuromove Research Group, Faculty of Sport, Catholic University of San Antonio (UCAM), Campus de los Jerónimos, 30107 Murcia, Spain. jormigohe91@gmail.com.
Lorena FrancoInterdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain. lorena.franco2@um.es.ORCID 0000-0003-3375-4274
David Colomer-PovedaNeuromove Research Group, Faculty of Sport, Catholic University of San Antonio (UCAM), Campus de los Jerónimos, 30107 Murcia, Spain. dcolomer@ucam.edu.
Silvia Martinez-SubielaInterdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain. silviams@um.es.ORCID 0000-0002-1524-1558
Ramón CugatGarcia Cugat Foundation, 08023 Barcelona, Spain. montse.garcia@sportrauma.com.
José J CerónInterdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain. jjceron@um.es.
Gonzalo MárquezNeuromove Research Group, Faculty of Sport, Catholic University of San Antonio (UCAM), Campus de los Jerónimos, 30107 Murcia, Spain. gmarquez@ucam.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2305-5229
Luis M Martínez-ArandaNeuromove Research Group, Faculty of Sport, Catholic University of San Antonio (UCAM), Campus de los Jerónimos, 30107 Murcia, Spain. lmmartinez2@ucam.edu.
Pedro Jimenez-ReyesCentre for Sport Studies, Rey Juan Carlos University, Fuenlabrada, 28943 Madrid, Spain. Peterjr49@hotmail.com.
Asta TvarijonaviciuteInterdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain. asta@um.es.
Universidad de Murcia · ESUniversidad Católica de Murcia · ESUniversidad Europea de Canarias · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uric acid (UA) is the most abundant antioxidant compound in saliva and one of the most sensitive biomarkers for detecting changes in the oxidative status of the organism. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of: (i) different methods of saliva sampling and (ii) the correction by salivary flow or total protein on UA concentrations in saliva. Paired saliva (collected by two different methods, passive drooling and using Salivette cotton rolls) and serum samples were obtained from 12 healthy men after the performance of two resistance training exercises of different level of effort that can produce different concentrations in UA in saliva. There were no significant differences between values of uric acid in saliva using Salivette and passive drool. Correlations between UA in serum and saliva and increases in UA in saliva after exercise were detected when saliva samples were obtained by passive drool and Salivette and were not corrected by salivary flow or total protein concentration. Therefore for UA measurements in saliva it would not be recommended to normalize the results by salivary flow or protein concentration. This study highlights the importance of choosing an adequate sampling method selection as well as the expression of results when analytes are measured in saliva.

Indexed as

biomarkersoxidative stresssalivettessquat

Identifiers

PMID31514287
PMCPMC6769926
OpenAlexW2973025366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.