ArticlePloS one2019
An artificial intelligent diagnostic system on mobile Android terminals for cholelithiasis by lightweight convolutional neural network.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in abdominal imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Detection of Gallbladder Disease Types Using a Feature Engineering-Based Developed CBIR System.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Computer-aided cholelithiasis diagnosis using explainable convolutional neural network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Transformer-powered precision: A DETR-based approach for robust detection in medical ultrasound with cholelithiasis as a case study.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Advancements in Cholelithiasis Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Applications in Imaging Analysis.Cureus · 2024Review
- Generative Adversarial Network (Generative Artificial Intelligence) in Pediatric Radiology: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Exploring the Presence of Humanoid Social Robots at Home and Capturing Human-Robot Interactions with Older Adults: Experiences from Four Case Studies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- End-to-End Calcification Distribution Pattern Recognition for Mammograms: An Interpretable Approach with GNN.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- An Application of Machine Learning to Etiological Diagnosis of Secondary Hypertension: Retrospective Study Using Electronic Medical Records.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- A CNN-aided method to predict glaucoma progression using DARC (Detection of Apoptosing Retinal Cells).Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2020Article
- Age and sex affect deep learning prediction of cardiometabolic risk factors from retinal images.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have been applied to diagnose or predict disease risk from medical images with recent data disclosure actions, but few of them are designed for mobile terminals due to the limited computational power and storage capacity of mobile devices. In this work, a novel AI diagnostic system is proposed for cholelithiasis recognition on mobile devices with Android platform. To this aim, a data set of CT images of cholelithiasis is firstly collected from The Third Hospital of Shandong Province, China, and then we technically use histogram equalization to preprocess these CT images. As results, a lightweight convolutional neural network is obtained in a constructive way to extract cholelith features and recognize gallstones. In terms of implementation, we compile Java and C++ to adapt to the application of deep learning algorithm on mobile devices with Android platform. Noted that, the training task is completed offline on PC, but cholelithiasis recognition tasks are performed on mobile terminals. We evaluate and compare the performance of our MobileNetV2 with MobileNetV1, Single Shot Detector (SSD), YOLOv2 and original SSD (with VGG-16) as feature extractors for object detection. It is achieved that our MobileNetV2 achieve similar accuracy rate, about 91% with the other four methods, but the number of parameters used is reduced from 36.1M (SSD 300, SSD512), 50.7M (Yolov2) and 5.1M (MobileNetV1) to 4.3M (MobileNetV2). The complete process on testing mobile devices, including Virtual machine, Xiaomi 7 and Htc One M8 can be controlled within 4 seconds in recognizing cholelithiasis as well as the degree of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.