Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31513328›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

Development and content validation of the Telenursing Interaction and Satisfaction Questionnaire (TISQ).

Marie Mattisson, Christina Johnson, Sussanne Börjeson, Kristofer Årestedt, Malou Lindberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development and content validation of the Telenursing Interaction and Satisfaction Questionnaire (TISQ).Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie MattissonDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5033-0874
Christina Johnson1177 Medical Advisory Service and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Sussanne BörjesonDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Kristofer ÅrestedtFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Malou Lindberg1177 Medical Advisory Service and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

Medical Research Council of Southeast SwedenÖstergötland county council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaller satisfaction with telephone advice nursing (TAN) is generally high, and the interaction is essential. However, a valid questionnaire exploring caller satisfaction in TAN with focus on perceived interaction is lacking.

objectiveTo develop and assess content validity and test-retest reliability of a theoretically anchored questionnaire, the Telenursing Interaction and Satisfaction Questionnaire (TISQ), that explores caller satisfaction in TAN by focusing on perceived interaction between the caller and the telenurse.

methodsThe study was performed in three stages. First, variables relevant for patient satisfaction in health care were identified through a literature search. Variables were then structured according to the Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior (IMCHB), which provided theoretical guidance. Items relevant for a TAN context were developed through consensus discussions. Then, evaluation and refinement were performed through cognitive interviews with callers and expert ratings of the Content Validity Index (CVI). Finally, test-retest reliability of items was evaluated in a sample of 109 individuals using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

resultsThe TISQ consists of 60 items. Twenty items cover perceived interaction in terms of health information, affective support, decisional control and professional/technical competence. Five items cover satisfaction with interaction and five items overall satisfaction. Remaining items reflect singularity of the caller and descriptive items of the call. The TISQ was found to exhibit good content validity, and test-retest reliability was moderate to good (ICC = 0.39-0.84).

conclusionsThe items in the TISQ form a comprehensive and theoretically anchored questionnaire with satisfactory content validity and test-retest reliability.

Indexed as

Nurse-Patient RelationsPatient SatisfactionTelenursingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairescommunicationcontent validitynurse-patient relationspatient experiencespatient satisfactionsurveys and questionnairestelenursing

Identifiers

PMID31513328
PMCPMC6882254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.