Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31513234›Full record

ArticleJAMA facial plastic surgery2019

Effect of a Vibratory Anesthetic Device on Pain Anticipation and Subsequent Pain Perception Among Patients Undergoing Cutaneous Cancer Removal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Panayiota Govas, Rashek Kazi, Rachel Marie Slaugenhaupt, Bryan T Carroll

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA facial plastic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03467685 nacompletednot on this map

Determining the Variable Factors in Cutaneous Perception of Vibratory Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2018 to 2018Enrolled101ConditionsPain, Acute, Anesthesia, Local, Dermatology/Skin - OtherArmsVibratory Anesthetic Device (VAD)
NCT06355817 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Distraction Techniques in Periocular Anesthesia: Tapping vs Vibration

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsAnesthetics, Local, Blepharoplasty, Age-Related Ptosis, AdultArmsVibration, Tapping
NCT06916468 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Improving Patient Comfort of Vibratory Anesthetic Devices With a Cotton Dampener

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterRan2025 to 2025Enrolled53ConditionsPatient CareArmsVAD with Cotton Dampener, Vibratory Anesthetic Device (VAD)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Vibration Anesthesia During Invasive Procedures: A Meta-analysis.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Panayiota GovasDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Rashek KaziDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Rachel Marie SlaugenhauptDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Bryan T CarrollDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceVibration has been shown to decrease injection site pain in patients; however, to date, this effect has not been assessed for patients who catastrophize pain (ie, patients who anticipate a higher pain level). The anticipation of a pain score greater than 4 on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) has been associated with an increase in a patient's perception of procedural pain.

objectiveTo assess the efficacy of vibration during cutaneous anesthetic injection for dermatologic surgery for patients who catastrophize pain (NRS score >4) and patients who do not (NRS score ≤4). DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsRandomized, parallel-group clinical trial from June 19 to September 4, 2018, at a tertiary dermatologic surgery clinic among 87 adults undergoing cutaneous cancer removal surgery. Patients completed a preprocedural questionnaire detailing their baseline pain, anticipated pain, and drug use. Analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis.

interventionsUse of a vibratory anesthetic device (VAD) on the treatment site prior to anesthetic injection in the on (VAD ON) or off (VAD OFF) mode. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Pain was reported using the 11-point NRS (where 0 indicates no pain and 11 indicates the worst pain imaginable). A minimum clinically important difference of 22% or more and a substantial clinically important difference of 57% or more were used to assess the efficacy of vibration in patient-reported NRS score during anesthetic injection (iNRS score).

resultsA total of 87 patients were included, with 101 unique events reported (among the unique events, 37 were reported in women and 64 were reported in men; mean [SD] age, 66.0 [11.3] years). The mean (confidence level [CL]) iNRS score for patients who catastrophized pain was 2.27 (0.66) compared with 1.44 (0.39) for patients who did not (P = .03). A 38.9% decrease in mean (CL) iNRS score was reported with VAD ON compared with VAD OFF in all participants (1.24 [0.38] vs 2.04 [0.54]). Patients who catastrophized pain reported a 25.5% decrease in mean (CL) iNRS score with VAD ON vs VAD OFF (1.91 [0.99] vs 2.57 [0.98]), and patients who did not reported a 79.4% decrease (1.02 [0.40] vs 1.84 [0.66]). VAD ON was the only statistically significant variable to affect iNRS score (F statistic, 2.741; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This trial demonstrates that those who catastrophize pain prior to a procedure report a higher perceived level of pain. The application of vibration during local anesthetic injection resulted in a minimum clinically important difference in pain level for patients who catastrophize pain and a substantial clinically important difference in pain level for patients who do not. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03467685.

Indexed as

Pain PerceptionVibrationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthetics, LocalCatastrophizationDermatologic Surgical ProceduresHumansInjectionsMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementSkin NeoplasmsAnesthetics, Local

Identifiers

PMID31513234
PMCPMC6743061
OpenAlexW2972864542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.