ArticlePediatric pulmonology2019
Evaluation of the pulmonary radioaerosol mucociliary clearance scan as an adjunctive test for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia in children.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society guidelines for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia.The European respiratory journal · 2025Guideline
- Unrecognized ciliary motility disorders in neutrophilic severe asthma exacerbations.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026Article
- Tracheobronchomalacia is common in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia-A case note review.Pediatric pulmonology · 2024Article
- Pulmonary radioaerosol mucociliary clearance assessment: searching for genotype-specific differences and potential as an outcome measure in primary ciliary dyskinesia.ERJ open research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe accuracy of primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) diagnosis has improved but no single test is diagnostic and some cases remain unsolved. Data regarding the accuracy of pulmonary radioaerosol mucociliary clearance scan (PRMCC) for the diagnosis of PCD are limited to predominantly adults using a 24-hour test. This study was performed to determine the accuracy of a 60-minute PRMCC test for diagnosing PCD in children.
methodsChildren with suspected PCD and inconclusive clinical diagnostic testing in an expert center were selected for PRMCC testing. Nebulized
resultsFrom 2008 to 2018, 57 patients (6-17 years) participated, of which 16 met criteria for the reference diagnosis of PCD. The PRMCC test was conclusive in 54 patients (94.7%) and had a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 78.2-100), specificity of 85.7% (95% CI = 69.7-95.2), positive predictive value of 75% (95% CI = 57.1-87.1), negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI = 90.2-100), and accuracy of 90% (95% CI = 78.2-96.7).
conclusionThe 60-minute PRMCC test is noninvasive and feasible in children with a high negative predictive value for PCD. It may be a helpful adjunctive test to rule out PCD when clinical suspicion remains after guideline recommended first-line clinical testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.