Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31512755›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2020

Digit ratio (2D:4D) and its behavioral correlates in infant rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Annika Paukner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07525726 (The Relationship Between Digit Ratio and Motor Development and Sensory Processing in Infants), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07525726 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Relationship Between Digit Ratio and Motor Development and Sensory Processing in Infants

TypeobservationalSponsorNigde Omer Halisdemir UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsInfant Developmental AssessmentArmsDigit Ratio, Motor development, Sensory processing functions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annika PauknerPsychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3421-1864
Nottingham Trent University · GB

Funding

Division of Intramural Research, NICHDIntramural NIH HHS Z99 HD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

2D:4D ratios are typically lower in adult human males than females and are linked to numerous sex-differentiated behaviors. 2D:4D ratios are considered an indicator of prenatal androgen exposure; if so, children's 2D:4D ratios would arguably be even better indicators of prenatal androgen exposure since children have experienced fewer postnatal influences than adults. However, sex differences in 2D:4D ratios as well as associations between 2D:4D ratios and sex-typed behaviors in children have been inconsistent. Several studies also report sex differences and behavioral correlates of 2D:4D ratios in adult non-human primates, but little is known about 2D:4D ratios in infant non-human primates. This study examined sex differences in 2D:4D ratios over the first month of life, and associations with behavioral outcomes at 12-24 weeks of age, in N = 304 infant rhesus macaques. An increase in 2D:4D ratios over the first month of life was found, as well as associations with aggression and play behaviors, but no sex differences in 2D:4D ratios were observed. These results highlight the need for future developmental studies of 2D:4D ratios in order to determine not only their stability and predictive value, but also to discern the mechanism connecting prenatal androgen exposure, 2D:4D ratios, and behavioral outcomes.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAge FactorsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornFemaleFingersMacaca mulattaMaleSocial Behavioraggressiondigit ratioinfantplaysex differences

Identifiers

PMID31512755
PMCPMC7065922
OpenAlexW2972887094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.