Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31512580›Full record

ReviewJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019

Mobile Apps for Medication Management: Review and Analysis.

Katarina Tabi, Abnashi Singh Randhawa, Fiona Choi, Zamina Mithani, Friederike Albers, Maren Schnieder, Mohammadali Nikoo, Daniel Vigo, Kerry Jang, Regina Demlova and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Katarina TabiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2826-6973
Abnashi Singh RandhawaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5528-2154
Fiona ChoiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7626-8669
Zamina MithaniDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7539-6383
Friederike AlbersCenter of Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3873-8348
Maren SchniederWolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8014-0924
Mohammadali NikooDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7692-3923
Daniel VigoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4445-4122
Kerry JangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0977-5377
Regina DemlovaDepartment of Pharmacology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3797-4453
Michael KrauszDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3509-7274

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacotherapy remains one of the major interventional strategies in medicine. However, patients from all age groups and conditions face challenges when taking medications, such as integrating them into the daily routine, understanding their effects and side effects, and monitoring outcomes. In this context, a reliable medication management tool adaptable to the patient's needs becomes critical. As most people have a mobile phone, mobile apps offer a platform for such a personalized support tool available on the go.

objectiveThis study aimed to provide an overview of available mobile apps, focusing on those that help patients understand and take their medications. We reviewed the existing apps and provided suggestions for future development based on the concept understand and manage, instead of the conventional adhere to medication. This concept aims to engage and empower patients to be in charge of their health, as well as see medication as part of a broader clinical approach, working simultaneously with other types of interventions or lifestyle changes, to achieve optimal outcomes.

methodsWe performed a Web search in the iOS Apple App Store and Android Google Play Store, using 4 search terms: medication management, pill reminder, medication health monitor, and medication helper. We extracted information from the app store descriptions for each eligible app and categorized into the following characteristics: features, author affiliation, specialty, user interface, cost, and user rating. In addition, we conducted Google searches to obtain more information about the author affiliation.

resultsA total of 328 apps (175 Android and 153 iOS) were categorized. The majority of the apps were developed by the software industry (73%, 11/15), a minority of them were codeveloped by health care professionals (15%, 3/20) or academia (2.1%; 7/328). The most prevalent specialty was diabetes (23 apps). Only 7 apps focused on mental health, but their content was highly comprehensive in terms of features and had the highest prevalence of the education component. The most prevalent features were reminder, symptom tracker, and ability to share data with a family member or doctor. In addition, we highlighted the features considered innovative and listed practical suggestions for future development and innovations.

conclusionsWe identified detailed characteristics of the existing apps, with the aim of informing future app development. Ultimately, the goal was to provide users with effective mobile health solutions, which can be expected to improve their engagement in the treatment process and long-term well-being. This study also highlighted the need for improved standards for reporting on app stores. Furthermore, it underlined the need for a platform to offer health app users an ongoing evaluation of apps by health professionals in addition to other users and to provide them with tools to easily select an appropriate and trustworthy app.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMedication SystemsMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsSelf CaredrugseHealthmHealthpharmaceuticalstherapy

Identifiers

PMID31512580
PMCPMC6786858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.