ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2019
[Research progress of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescents].
Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Comparison of femoral oval tunnel technique and round tunnel technique in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo review the advances in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in adolescents at home and abroad.
methodsRecent literature about double-bundle ACL reconstruction in adolescents at home and abroad was extensively consulted, and the relationship between bone canal and epiphyseal plate, clinical verification of surgical safety, and clinical effectiveness of double-bundle ACL reconstruction in adolescents were summarized and analyzed.
resultsDouble-bundle ACL reconstruction has certain advantages in clinical stability and re-rupture rate when compared with single-bundle ACL reconstruction in adolescents, and there is no significant difference in safety between them.
conclusionDouble-bundle ACL reconstruction in adolescents can achieve lower re-rupture rate and better stability when compared with single-bundle reconstruction. However, the sample size of clinical research is too small, and the follow-up time is too short, so the effectiveness needs to be continuously observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.