Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31512202›Full record

ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2020

Direct oral anticoagulants: a review on the current role and scope of reversal agents.

Rahul Chaudhary, Tushar Sharma, Jalaj Garg, Ajaypaul Sukhi, Kevin Bliden, Udaya Tantry, Mohit Turagam, Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, Paul Gurbel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Synthesis of the evidence on the impact of pre-operative direct oral anticoagulants on patient health outcomes after hip fracture surgery: rapid systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rahul ChaudharyDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Chaudhary.rahul@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3276-385X
Tushar SharmaSinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jalaj GargMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Ajaypaul SukhiSinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kevin BlidenInova Center for Thrombosis Research and Drug Development, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA, USA.
Udaya TantrySinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mohit TuragamHelmsley Electrophysiology Center in the Department of Cardiology and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Dhanunjaya LakkireddyUniversity of Kansas, Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Paul GurbelInova Center for Thrombosis Research and Drug Development, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA, USA.
Sinai Hospital · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMayo Clinic · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New guideline recommendations prefer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin in DOAC-eligible patients with atrial fibrillation and patients with venous thromboembolism. As expected with all antithrombotic agents, there is an associated increased risk of bleeding complications in patients receiving DOACs that can be attributed to the DOAC itself, or other issues such as acute trauma, invasive procedures, or underlying comorbidities. For the majority of severe bleeding events, the widespread approach is to withdraw the DOAC, then provide supportive measures and "watchful waiting" with the expectation that the bleeding event will resolve with time. However, urgent reversal of anticoagulation may be advantageous in patients with serious or life-threatening bleeding or in those requiring urgent surgery or procedures. Until recently, the lack of specific reversal agents, has affected the uptake of these agents in clinical practice despite a safer profile compared to warfarin in clinical trials. In cases of life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding or when patients require emergency surgery or urgent procedures, idarucizumab has been recently approved for reversal of anticoagulation in dabigatran-treated patients and andexanet alfa for factor Xa inhibitor-treated treated patients. The current review summarizes the current clinical evidence and scope of these agents with the potential impact on DOAC use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnticoagulantsBlood CoagulationClinical Trials as TopicFactor XaHemorrhageHumansRecombinant ProteinsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnticoagulantsFactor XaidarucizumabPRT064445Recombinant ProteinsAndexanet alfaApixabanBetrixabanDabigatranDOACsEdoxabanIdarucizumabReversalRivaroxaban

Identifiers

PMID31512202
OpenAlexW2972503050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.