Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31512192›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychology review2019

Neurobiological and Cognitive Profile of Young Binge Drinkers: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Briana Lees, Louise Mewton, Lexine A Stapinski, Lindsay M Squeglia, Caroline D Rae, Maree Teesson

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Randomized Controlled Trial of N-acetylcysteine for Adolescent and Young Adult Alcohol Use Disorder.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Adolescent alcohol consumption predicted by differences in electrophysiological functional connectivity and neuroanatomy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Consequences of adolescent drug use.Translational psychiatry · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Briana LeesThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. briana.lees@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9888-8794
Louise MewtonCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Lexine A StapinskiThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Lindsay M SquegliaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Caroline D RaeNeuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Maree TeessonThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AUMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

13/21 ABCD-USA CONSORTIUM: RESEARCH PROJECT SITE AT MUSCU01DA041093 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Kevin M. Gray, Lindsay Squeglia · 2017 to 2026
$10.7M
A Proof-of-Concept Trial of N-Acetylcysteine for Adolescent Alcohol Use DisorderR01AA027399 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI GRAY, KEVIN M, SQUEGLIA, LINDSAY · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Neuroscience-informed Treatment Development for Adolescent Alcohol Use DisordersK23AA025399 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SQUEGLIA, LINDSAY · 2016 to 2020
$1.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA025399NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA027399NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides the first systematic and quantitative synthesis of the literature examining the relationship between binge drinking, cognition, brain structure and function in youth aged 10 to 24 years. PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, PsychINFO and ProQuest were searched for neuroimaging, neurophysiological, and neuropsychological studies. A total of 58 studies (21 neuroimaging, 16 neurophysiological, 21 neuropsychological) met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Overall, abnormal or delayed development of key frontal executive-control regions may predispose youth to binge drink. These abnormalities appear to be further exacerbated by the uptake of binge drinking, in addition to alcohol-related neural aberrations in reward-seeking and incentive salience regions, indexed by cognitive deficits and maladaptive alcohol associations. A meta-analysis of neuropsychological correlates identified that binge drinking in youth was associated with a small overall neurocognitive deficit (g = -0.26) and specific deficits in decision-making (g = -1.70), and inhibition (g = -0.39). Using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence Profile, the certainty in outcomes ranged from very low to low. Future prospective longitudinal studies should address concomitant factors, exposure thresholds, and age-related vulnerabilities of binge drinking, as well as the degree of recovery following discontinuation of use.

Indexed as

Binge DrinkingAdolescentBrainDecision MakingExecutive FunctionHumansInhibition, PsychologicalNeuropsychological TestsAlcoholBinge drinkingBrain functionBrain structureCognitionNeurodevelopment

Identifiers

PMID31512192
PMCPMC7231524
OpenAlexW2972850215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.