ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019
"You Guys Really Care About Me…": a Qualitative Exploration of a Produce Prescription Program in Safety Net Clinics.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Local Food System Approaches to Address Food and Nutrition Security among Low-Income Populations: A Systematic Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Pooled it
- Experiences of people with diabetes receiving a voucher for healthy foods: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2026Trial
- Healthcare provider perceptions of a pediatric fruit and vegetable prescription program: a qualitative study.BMC nutrition · 2026Article
- Fresh Food Rx: Evaluating the Impact of a Produce Prescription Program on Engagement and Well-being Using the RE-AIM Framework.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- The realities of data derived from electronic health records to evaluate health outcomes, utilization, and cost of produce prescription programs: A multiple case study evaluation.Journal of public health research · 2025Article
- 'Food is Medicine' to advance mental health and build resilient food systems globally.Nature food · 2025Article
- Implementation of Food is Medicine Programs in Healthcare Settings: A Narrative Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Review
- How does fresh food prescribing fit into the social service landscape? A qualitative study in Ontario, Canada.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2024Article
- Exploring the prospective acceptability of a healthy food incentive program from the perspective of people with type 2 diabetes and experiences of household food insecurity in Alberta, Canada.Public health nutrition · 2024Article
- Clients' experiences and satisfaction with produce prescription programs in California: a qualitative evaluation to inform person-centered and respectful program models.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Client experience of food assistance programs among adults in the United States: a qualitative evidence synthesis protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Healthcare-based food assistance programmes in the United States: a scoping review and typology.Journal of nutritional science · 2023Article
- Article
- Produce prescription projects: Challenges, solutions, and emerging best practices - Perspectives from health care providers.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Facilitators and Barriers to Patient Attendance at a Free Health Center Produce Market.American journal of preventive medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Promoting Healthy Food Access and Nutrition in Primary Care: A Systematic Scoping Review of Food Prescription Programs.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2022Article
- An exploration of key barriers to healthcare providers' use of food prescription (FRx) interventions in the rural South.Public health nutrition · 2021Article
- The food pharmacy: Theory, implementation, and opportunities.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2021Review
- "I was eating more fruits and veggies than I have in years": a mixed methods evaluation of a fresh food prescription intervention.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough research shows produce prescription (PRx) programs increase fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption, little is known about how participants experience them.
objectiveTo better understand how participants experience a PRx program for hypertensive adults at 3 safety net clinics partnered with 20 farmers' markets (FMs) in Cleveland, OH.
designWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 5 program providers, 23 patient participants, and 2 FM managers.
participantsPatients interviewed were mainly middle-aged (mean age 62 years), African American (100%), and women (78%). Providers were mainly middle-aged men and women of diverse races/ethnicities.
interventionHealthcare providers enrolled adult patients who were food insecure and diagnosed with hypertension. Participating patients attended monthly clinic visits for 3 months. Each visit included a blood pressure (BP) check, dietary counseling for BP control, a produce prescription, and produce vouchers redeemable at local FMs. APPROACH: Patient interviews focused on (1) beliefs about food, healthy eating, and FMs; (2) clinic-based program experiences; and (3) FM experiences. Provider and market manager interviews focused on program provision. All interviews were audio-taped, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. KEY
resultsWe identified four central themes. First, providers and patients reported positive interactions during program activities, but providers struggled to integrate the program into their workflow. Second, patients reported greater FV intake and FM shopping during the program. Third, social interactions enhanced program experience. Fourth, economic hardships influenced patient shopping and eating patterns, yet these hardships were minimized in some participants' views of patient deservingness for program inclusion.
conclusionsOur findings highlight promises and challenges of PRx programs for economically disadvantaged patients with a chronic condition. Patient participants reported improved interactions with providers, increased FV consumption, and incorporation of healthy eating into their social networks due to the program. Future efforts should focus on efficiently integrating PRx into clinic workflows, leveraging patient social networks, and including economic supports for maintenance of behavior change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.