ReviewHeart failure reviews2020
CardioMEMS, the real progress in heart failure home monitoring.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Diuretic Use in Heart Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Materials Advances in Devices for Heart Disease Interventions.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Heart Failure: Friend or Foe?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Device-based percutaneous treatments to decompress the left atrium in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Heart failure reviews · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The burden of hospitalizations driven by exacerbation of acute heart failure remains unacceptably high. The associated use of hospital resources drives increasing patient, caregiver, and economic costs. Noninvasive telemedical systems investigated in randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate to reduce hospitalization rates probably because of the indirect (non-linear) relationship of the measured biological signals with the patient congestion status. Instead, there is increasing evidence that direct measure of intracardiac and pulmonary artery pressure can effectively guide heart failure management and reduce hospitalizations. Early studies adopting implantable hemodynamic monitors in the right heart unveiled the potential of pressure-based heart failure management, whereas subsequent investigations showed the powerful preemptive approach for heart failure exacerbations. One large randomized trial (CHAMPION) proved that a direct pulmonary pressure monitor system (CardioMEMS) substantially reduced heart failure hospitalizations in subjects randomized to active pulmonary pressure-guided management. The system monitoring safety and efficacy were also excellent. The study proved that early management in response to increased pulmonary pressure is able to provide the most effective therapeutic intervention to prevent heart failure exacerbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31512148What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.