Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31512089›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2019

Optimization of Cancer Treatment in the Frequency Domain.

Pascal Schulthess, Vivi Rottschäfer, James W T Yates, Piet H van der Graaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pascal SchulthessLYO-X GmbH, Basel, Switzerland.
Vivi RottschäferMathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
James W T YatesDMPK, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Chesterford Research Park, Cambridge, UK.
Piet H van der GraafSystems Biomedicine & Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands. p.vandergraaf@lacdr.leidenuniv.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thorough exploration of alternative dosing frequencies is often not performed in conventional pharmacometrics approaches. Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) can provide novel insights into optimal dosing regimen and drug behaviors which could add a new dimension to the design of novel treatments. However, methods for such an approach are currently lacking. Recently, we illustrated the utility of frequency-domain response analysis (FdRA), an analytical method used in control engineering, using several generic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic case studies. While FdRA is not applicable to models harboring ever increasing variables such as those describing tumor growth, studying such models in the frequency domain provides valuable insight into optimal dosing frequencies. Through the analysis of three distinct tumor growth models (cell cycle-specific, metronomic, and acquired resistance), we demonstrate the application of a simulation-based analysis in the frequency domain to optimize cancer treatments. We study the response of tumor growth to dosing frequencies while simultaneously examining treatment safety, and found for all three models that above a certain dosing frequency, tumor size is insensitive to an increase in dosing frequency, e.g., for the cell cycle-specific model, one dose per 3 days, and an hourly dose yield the same reduction of tumor size to 3% of the initial size after 1 year of treatment. Additionally, we explore the effect of drug elimination rate changes on the tumor growth response. In summary, we show that the frequency-domain view of three models of tumor growth dynamics can help in optimizing drug dosing regimen to improve treatment success.

Indexed as

Administration, MetronomicModels, BiologicalAntineoplastic AgentsCell CycleDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansNeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeTumor BurdenAntineoplastic Agentscancerdosing frequency optimizationfrequency-domain response analysisquantitative systems pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID31512089
PMCPMC6739279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.