ArticleSurgery today2020
Risk factors for the incidence and severity of peristomal skin disorders defined using two scoring systems.
Article in Surgery today, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application and Efficacy Evaluation of a Modified Ostomy Appliance in Managing Peristomal Irritant Contact Dermatitis: A Randomised Controlled Trial.International wound journal · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Prospective Multicenter Study to Clarify the Frequency of Peristomal Skin Disorders and Appropriate Evaluation Time in Patients With Malignant Rectal Tumors.Annals of surgery · 2026Observational
- The Japan Society of Coloproctology Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence 2024 (Revised Second Edition).Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2026Review
- Association of chemotherapy and stoma features with peristomal skin disorders in rectal cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for loop colostomy: a propensity-score-matched analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Article
- Assessment, diagnosis and treatment of peristomal skin lesions by remote imaging: An expert validation study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2023Observational
- The presurgical controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is independently associated with severe peristomal skin disorders: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Risk factors for peristomal skin disorders associated with temporary ileostomy construction.Surgery today · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePeristomal skin disorders (PSDs) are common stoma-related complications. However, there is no standard method for the evaluation of PSDs, and the true incidence is unclear. There are also no reports on risk factors for severe PSDs. Therefore, this study was performed to analyze the incidence of PSD in temporary loop stoma based on the DET score and ABCD-stoma score and to determine the risk factors for all and severe PSDs.
methodsA retrospective analysis of patient and surgical characteristics was carried out in 333 consecutive cases of stoma creation with loop ileostomy or colostomy performed at our hospital from January 2014 to December 2016.
resultsPSDs were diagnosed in 262 patients (78.7%), including 79 (23.7%) and 71 (21.3%) that were defined as severe based on DET and ABCD-stoma scores, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that parastomal hernia was an independent risk factor for severe PSD defined by DET score and that adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent risk factor for severe PSD defined by the ABCD-stoma score.
conclusionsSevere PSDs are associated with parastomal hernia when diagnosed by the DET score and with adjuvant chemotherapy when diagnosed by the ABCD-stoma score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.