Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31511983›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2019

Factors affecting dental DNA in various real post-mortem conditions.

Hussam Mansour, Oliver Krebs, Hans O Pinnschmidt, Nadine Griem, Ilona Hammann-Ehrt, Klaus Püschel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Dental DNA as an Indicator of Post-Mortem Interval (PMI): A Pilot Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hussam Mansour *Institute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Butenfeld 34, 22529, Hamburg, Germany. Hussam.Mansour@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2722-638X
Oliver Krebs *Institute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Butenfeld 34, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.
Hans O PinnschmidtCenter of Experimental Medicine, Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Nadine GriemInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Butenfeld 34, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.
Ilona Hammann-EhrtInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Butenfeld 34, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.
Klaus PüschelInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Butenfeld 34, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) 57169181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-mortem DNA degradation is still the real challenge of DNA-based identification in forensic practise. It is a complicated multifactorial process occurring as a result of the combination of several different environmental effects along with the crucial effect of the elapsed post-mortem interval (PMI). The main purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effect of ante- and post-mortem factors on dental DNA in real forensic cases. Ninety-five teeth extracted from 39 corpses, whose bodies were subject to 6 different post-mortem conditions, were used to evaluate dental DNA amount. In total, 179 DNA extracts isolated from the root of the teeth were examined after removing the crown and sectioning each root into apical and cervical portions. DNA concentration was measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction DNA quantitation kit (PowerQuant™ System/Promega). Our results indicate that the post-mortem interval (PMI) is the most important influential factor on dental DNA quantification (p < 0.001). However, in the actual data set, it was confounded with several ante- and post-mortem factors, rendering its actual net effect difficult. The time period of the first 10 days after death yielded the best DNA results from all analysed dental samples. Afterwards, a dramatic decrease in dental DNA was observed in the following time period. Teeth extracted from burnt and fresh corpses yielded the highest amount of DNA, while skeletonized exhumed corpses resulted in the lowest DNA amount. Indeed, dry and indoor conditions demonstrated better results than those in water, outdoors, or buried in the ground. On the other hand, ante-mortem factors including sex, age, tooth type, and tooth root portions did not reveal significant effect on dental DNA yield. We suggest that ante-mortem factors are considerably more subjected to individual variations. Post-mortem factors including PMI, post-mortem conditions, and the relevant surrounding environments have substantial influence on the dental DNA amount yielded.

Indexed as

Postmortem ChangesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDNADNA FingerprintingExhumationFemaleFiresForensic DentistryHumansMaleMiddle AgedReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTooth ApexTooth RootDNADNA quantificationGenetic identificationPost-mortem interval (PMI)Teeth

Identifiers

PMID31511983
OpenAlexW2972623964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.