ArticleInternational orthopaedics2019
Clinical experience with combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligaments of the knee in sportsmen.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative study between lateral extra-articular tenodesis versus anterolateral ligament reconstruction in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Trial
- Lateral extra-articular procedures in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduce graft failure rates in elite and competitive athletes: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Shows Reduced Graft Failure Rates and Superior Residual Rotational Stability Regardless of Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Graft: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The single antegrade sling graft: a novel hamstring autograft technique for combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Greater return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction compared with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction alone: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Does combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction improve return to sport?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Graft choices for anterolateral ligament knee reconstruction surgery: Current concepts.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Review
- Clinical and mechanical outcomes in isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionWorld journal of orthopedics · 2022Article
- A Review of Current Concepts of the Anterolateral Complex of the Knee.Orthopedic reviews · 2022Article
- There are differences in knee stability based on lateral extra-articular augmentation technique alongside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021Review
- Clinical outcomes of combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee surgery & related research · 2021Review
- Clinical Outcomes of Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction or Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Combined With Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Review
- Clinical outcomes of contemporary lateral augmentation techniques in primary ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most common sports injuries of the knee joint. Today, we have a large number of approaches to arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament that lead to successful outcomes and allow the patients to return to a significant level of activity post-operatively. Nevertheless, the return to competitions rate stays relatively low. The functional state is thought to be dependent on rotational and anteroposterior stability of the knee. These data encourage search for methods of additional stabilization of the knee joint, one of them being extra-articular tenodesis, or reconstruction of anterolateral ligament of the knee. THE AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate medium-term results of combined simultaneous arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament of the knee joint in sportsmen and to access the probability of return to competitions. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe surgeries were performed in 2014-2015 in 50 patients who fulfilled the entry criteria: 20 patients (including 10 professional sportsmen) underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction together with reconstruction of anterolateral ligament-group 1 (main group), and 30 patients (including 10 professional sportsmen) underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction-group 2 (control group).
resultsGroup 1: All patients of group 1 were able to return to the pre-operative sports level in two years after the surgery. The mean Tegner Lysholm score was 72.6 ± 6.45 (hereinafter, SE-standard error) before the surgery and 97.4 ± 1.18 after the surgery. The mean IKDC score was 63.1 ± 4.8% before the surgery and 96.3 ± 1.8% after the surgery. Group 2: 20 of 30 patients (66.7%) returned to the pre-operative level of activity and returned to competitions (if they were professional sportsmen) in a year after the surgery. Five of ten patients (50%) (professional sportsmen) returned to competitions. Fifteen of 20 patients (75%) (amateur sportsmen) also returned to competitions. The mean pre-operative Tegner Lysholm score was 69.6 ± 3.5, and the mean post-operative score was 92.1 ± 3.9. The mean pre-operative IKDC score was 73.4 ± 3.2%, and the mean post-operative score was 90.3 ± 3.7%.
conclusionThe results of the study show that more patients with higher functional demands and more professional sportsmen returned to sports. Despite the results of our and other foreign studies, a need remains for studies that will compare outcomes of ALL reconstruction with the same surgical technique in homogenous groups of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.