ArticleHNO2020
[In vitro exposure of human nasal mucous membrane cells and lymphocytes to snuff].
Article in HNO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile an abundant number of studies concerning tobacco smoke and chewing tobacco show carcinogenic potential, there is little data on the consequences of snuff, especially on the cellular level. Therefore, the mutagenic effect of snuff is difficult to estimate and the WHO assessment of snuff being not carcinogenic is based on very limited data.
objectivesThis paper investigates the potential cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of snuff on human lymphocytes and nasal mucosa cells. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo types of snuff were used: one without menthol and one with a high degree of menthol. The necessary nasal mucosa cells and lymphocytes were collected from 10 subjects undergoing nasal obstruction surgery and incubated for one hour with a snuff-DMSO mixture (range 0.01-2000 µg/ml). Methods included the trypan blue test, the comet assay, and the micronucleus test.
resultsThe trypan blue test showed no decrease in cell viability for either cell type. The comet assay revealed a significant increase in the Olive Tail Moment for lymphocytes starting at 100 µg/ml and at 1000 µg/ml for nasal mucosa cells. There was no significant increase in micronuclei according to the micronucleus test. No differences between these two types of tobacco were observed.
conclusionThe present study demonstrated genotoxic damage, such as DNA strand breaks, which may be repaired, but no non-repairable elevated micronuclei. The present findings cast doubts on the WHO assessment that snuff is not carcinogenic. However, for a sound assessment of the risk potential of snuff, further research on various genotoxic endpoints in human cells is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31511908What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.