Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31511844›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2019

Identification and Confirmation of Potentially Actionable Germline Mutations in Tumor-Only Genomic Sequencing.

Dana Farengo Clark, Kara N Maxwell, Jacquelyn Powers, David B Lieberman, Jessica Ebrahimzadeh, Jessica M Long, Danielle McKenna, Payal Shah, Angela Bradbury, Jennifer J D Morrissette and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gastric epithelium frombioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Limited Independent Follow-Up with Germline Testing of Variants Detected inJournal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Identification and Management of Pathogenic Variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 in a Tumor-Only Genomic Testing Program.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ordering and Interpreting Precision Oncology Studies for Adults With Advanced Solid Tumors: A Primer.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dana Farengo ClarkPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Kara N MaxwellPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Jacquelyn PowersPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
David B LiebermanPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Jessica EbrahimzadehPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Jessica M LongPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Danielle McKennaPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Payal ShahPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Angela BradburyPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Jennifer J D MorrissettePerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Katherine L NathansonPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Susan M DomchekPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHELLEY L BERGER · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
A genotype-phenotype study of tumors from patients with inherited mutations in DNA repair genesK08CA215312 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MAXWELL, KARA N · 2018 to 2022
$924k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA215312NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTumor-only genomic profiling (TGP) is increasingly advocated for all patients with cancer given the possible therapeutic implications. It is critical to develop clinical algorithms to identify and address potentially actionable germline findings identified by TGP.

methodsA multidisciplinary team analyzed publicly available data for genes in which mutations are implicated in germline cancer susceptibility and established a pipeline to automate clinical referral for evaluation of TGP findings.

resultsA total of 2,308 patients underwent TGP, with 81 patients (3.5%) identified by the automatic referral pipeline; 37 patients (1.6%) were referred outside the pipeline based on concerns by the molecular geneticist, pathologist, or oncologist regarding genotype-phenotype correlation. Thirty-one patients (38%) and 17 patients (46%) underwent germline testing from the automatic pipeline and other referrals, respectively, and of these patients, 23 (72%) and four (24%) had confirmed germline pathogenic variants (GPVs), respectively. The majority of confirmed GPVs were in automatic referral genes, with

conclusionOf patients undergoing TGP, 5% had somatic findings triggering referral, and implementation of an automatic referral pipeline based solely on gene versus other clinical or molecular features resulted in a 74% germline confirmation. However, only 41% of referred patients underwent germline testing. Systems-based approaches are needed to identify carriers of actionable germline cancer susceptibility mutations identified by TGP.

Identifiers

PMID31511844
PMCPMC6738953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.