Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31511830›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of clinical and experimental urology2019

Urinary metabolites for urological cancer detection: a review on the application of volatile organic compounds for cancers.

Qin Gao, Wen-Yee Lee

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of clinical and experimental urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qin GaoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at El Paso El Paso, TX, USA.
Wen-Yee LeeDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at El Paso El Paso, TX, USA.
The University of Texas at El Paso · US

Funding

Urinary biomarkers for prostate cancer diagnosis and risk assessmentSC1CA245675 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI LEE, WEN-YEE · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS SC1 CA245675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is one of the most devastating human diseases that causes a great number of mortalities each year worldwide. Thus, finding and treating cancers early is of increasing interest to the public and presents great opportunity for research. It is well known that the metabolism of cancer cells differs from that of normal tissues. Analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), a group of small molecule metabolites, provides an emerging approach for cancer screening and disease monitoring. VOCs are continuously generated in human body and released through breath, blood, skin, urine and fecal samples, which carry information of the physiological and metabolic status. Furthermore, the development of effective analytical methods for VOCs detection is one of the challenging aspects in cancer research. In this review, the analytical methods such as solid-phase mirco-extraction (SPME) and stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) coupled with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS), the application of VOCs in urological cancers diagnosis and potential molecules pathways related to VOCs profile for cancer detection are discussed.

Indexed as

cancerdiagnosismetabolomicsUrinevolatile organic compounds (VOCs)

Identifiers

PMID31511830
PMCPMC6734043
OpenAlexW3022031229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.