Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31511553›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Reduction of bias in the evaluation of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity in magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging using region-of-interest methodology.

Youngseob Seo, Nancy K Rollins, Zhiyue J Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Presumed Pediatric Isolated Oculomotor Nerve Schwannoma - A Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Youngseob SeoCenter for Medical Metrology, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. yseo@kriss.re.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5233-4422
Nancy K RollinsDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Zhiyue J WangDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5649-2900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate quantification of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) in MR diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) requires adequate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) especially in low FA areas of the brain, which necessitates clinically impractical long image acquisition times. We explored a SNR enhancement strategy using region-of-interest (ROI)-based diffusion tensor for quantification. DTI scans from a healthy male were acquired 15 times and combined into sets with different number of signal averages (NSA = 1-4, 15) at one 1.5-T Philips and three 3-T (Philips, Siemens and GE) scanners. Equivalence test was performed to determine NSA thresholds for bias-free FA and MD quantifications by comparison with reference values derived from images with NSA = 15. We examined brain areas with low FA values including caudate nucleus, globus pallidus, putamen, superior temporal gyrus, and substructures within thalamus (lateral dorsal, ventral anterior and posterior nuclei), where bias-free FA is difficult to obtain using a conventional approach. Our results showed that bias-free FA can be obtained with NSA = 2 or 3 in some cases using ROI-based analysis. ROI-based analysis allows reliable FA and MD quantifications in various brain structures previously difficult to study with clinically feasible data acquisition schemes.

Identifiers

PMID31511553
PMCPMC6739503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.