Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31511545›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Alternative classifications of neurons based on physiological properties and synaptic responses, a computational study.

Ferenc Hernáth, Katalin Schlett, Attila Szücs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ferenc HernáthMTA-ELTE-NAP B Neuronal Cell Biology Research Group, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Katalin SchlettMTA-ELTE-NAP B Neuronal Cell Biology Research Group, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Attila SzücsMTA-ELTE-NAP B Neuronal Cell Biology Research Group, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary. aszucs@ucsd.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the central goals of today's neuroscience is to achieve the conceivably most accurate classification of neuron types in the mammalian brain. As part of this research effort, electrophysiologists commonly utilize current clamp techniques to gain a detailed characterization of the neurons' physiological properties. While this approach has been useful, it is not well understood whether neurons that share physiological properties of a particular phenotype would also operate consistently under the action of natural synaptic inputs. We approached this problem by simulating a biophysically diverse population of model neurons based on 3 generic phenotypes. We exposed the model neurons to two types of stimulation to investigate their voltage responses under conventional current step protocols and under simulated synaptic bombardment. We extracted standard physiological parameters from the voltage responses elicited by current step stimulation and spike arrival times descriptive of the model's firing behavior under synaptic inputs. The biophysical phenotypes could be reliably identified using classification based on the 'static' physiological properties, but not the interspike interval-based parameters. However, the model neurons associated with the biophysically different phenotypes retained cell type specific features in the fine structure of their spike responses that allowed their accurate classification.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsMultivariate AnalysisNeuronsSynapsesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31511545
PMCPMC6739481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.