ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2020
Endovascular Revascularization Improves the Central Hemodynamics and Augmentation Index in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skeletal muscle desmin alterations following revascularization in peripheral artery disease claudicants.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Impact of Modified HCirculation reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effect of endovascular therapy (EVT) on the central blood pressure (CBP) and augmentation index (AIx) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Methods The CBP and AIx were assessed by radial applanation tonometry the day before and the day after EVT. We compared the differences in the therapeutic effects between the stenotic and occlusive lesions and between the iliac and superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions. Patients We enrolled 60 consecutive patients with PAD who underwent EVT for de novo lesions. Results Both the CBP and AIx were significantly decreased after EVT (125±22 mmHg to 112±22 mmHg; p=0.002 and 84%±16% to 73%±15%; p<0.001, respectively). The effects of EVT on the CBP and AIx were equivalent, regardless of whether the target lesion was the stenotic lesion or the occlusive lesion. There were no significant differences between the iliac and SFA lesions in the effects of EVT on the CBP and AIx. Conclusion EVT improved the CBP and AIx in patients with PAD, regardless of the morphology or site of the lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.