ArticleGenetics2019
Bayesian Estimation of Population Size Changes by Sampling Tajima's Trees.
Article in Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetics under the Infinite Sites Model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- An efficient coalescent model for heterochronously sampled molecular data.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024Article
- Article
- Robust inference of population size histories from genomic sequencing data.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Enumeration of binary trees compatible with a perfect phylogeny.Journal of mathematical biology · 2022Article
- Statistical Challenges in Tracking the Evolution of SARS-CoV-2.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2022Article
- Distance metrics for ranked evolutionary trees.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- SEQUENTIAL IMPORTANCE SAMPLING FOR MULTIRESOLUTION KINGMAN-TAJIMA COALESCENT COUNTING.The annals of applied statistics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The large state space of gene genealogies is a major hurdle for inference methods based on Kingman's coalescent. Here, we present a new Bayesian approach for inferring past population sizes, which relies on a lower-resolution coalescent process that we refer to as "Tajima's coalescent." Tajima's coalescent has a drastically smaller state space, and hence it is a computationally more efficient model, than the standard Kingman coalescent. We provide a new algorithm for efficient and exact likelihood calculations for data without recombination, which exploits a directed acyclic graph and a correspondingly tailored Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. We compare the performance of our Bayesian Estimation of population size changes by Sampling Tajima's Trees (BESTT) with a popular implementation of coalescent-based inference in BEAST using simulated and human data. We empirically demonstrate that BESTT can accurately infer effective population sizes, and it further provides an efficient alternative to the Kingman's coalescent. The algorithms described here are implemented in the R package phylodyn, which is available for download at https://github.com/JuliaPalacios/phylodyn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.