Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31511294›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Testing a digital system that ranks the risk of unplanned intensive care unit admission in all ward patients: protocol for a prospective observational cohort study.

James Malycha, Oliver C Redfern, Guy Ludbrook, Duncan Young, Peter J Watkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James MalychaNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK james.malycha@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9668-1431
Oliver C RedfernNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Guy LudbrookFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Duncan YoungNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Peter J WatkinsonNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1023-3927

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTraditional early warning scores (EWSs) use vital sign derangements to detect clinical deterioration in patients treated on hospital wards. Combining vital signs with demographics and laboratory results improves EWS performance. We have developed the Hospital Alerting Via Electronic Noticeboard (HAVEN) system. HAVEN uses vital signs, as well as demographic, comorbidity and laboratory data from the electronic patient record, to quantify and rank the risk of unplanned admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) within 24 hours for all ward patients. The primary aim of this study is to find additional variables, potentially missed during development, which may improve HAVEN performance. These variables will be sought in the medical record of patients misclassified by the HAVEN risk score during testing.

methodsThis will be a prospective, observational, cohort study conducted at the John Radcliffe Hospital, part of the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in the UK. Each day during the study periods, we will document all highly ranked patients (ie, those with the highest risk for unplanned ICU admission) identified by the HAVEN system. After 48 hours, we will review the progress of the identified patients. Patients who were subsequently ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval has been granted for gathering the data used in this study from the South Central Oxford C Research Ethics Committee (16/SC/0264, 13 June 2016) and the Confidentiality Advisory Group (16/CAG/0066). DISCUSSION: Our study will use a clinical expert conducting a structured medical notes review to identify variables, associated with unplanned ICU admission, not included in the development of the HAVEN risk score. These variables will then be added to the risk score and evaluated for potential performance gain. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of this type. We anticipate that documenting the HAVEN development methods will assist other research groups developing similar technology. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12518261.

Indexed as

HospitalizationIntensive Care UnitsElectronic Health RecordsHospital MortalityHospitals, UniversityHumansObservational Studies as TopicPatients' RoomsProspective StudiesResearch DesignRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexUnited KingdomVital Signsclinical deteriorationcritical care unitelectronic patient recordintensive care unitpredictive scorequalitative medical note review

Identifiers

PMID31511294
PMCPMC6747664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.