ArticleChest2019
The Challenging Diagnosis of Septic Cardiomyopathy.
Article in Chest, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as mechanical circulatory support in adult septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis with individual participant data meta-regression analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Cardiovascular Diseases in the Critically Ill: Bridging Evidence Gaps Between Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction diagnosed with strain versus non-strain echocardiography parameters: incidence, evolution and association with prognosis.Annals of intensive care · 2025Article
- Prognostic analysis of sepsis-induced myocardial injury patients using propensity score matching and doubly robust analysis with machine learning-based risk prediction model development.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Prevalence and prognosis of hyperdynamic left ventricular systolic function in septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of intensive care · 2024Article
- Transesophageal echocardiography combined with ProAQT/PulsioFlex hemodynamic monitoring in anesthetic management of a patient with septic shock associated with septic cardiomyopathy: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
- Characterization of septic cardiomyopathy: assessment of left ventricular diastolic function is paramount!ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- The interplay between left ventricular diastolic and right ventricular dysfunction: challenges in the interpretation of critical care echocardiography studies.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Haemodynamic monitoring in acute heart failure - what you need to know.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2022Review
- Systolic dysfunction and mortality in critically ill patients: more data are needed to believe in this association!ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- FUN14 Domain Containing 1 (FUNDC1): A Promising Mitophagy Receptor Regulating Mitochondrial Homeostasis in Cardiovascular Diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Berberine attenuates septic cardiomyopathy by inhibiting TLR4/NF-κB signalling in rats.Pharmaceutical biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Prognostic Role of Left Ventricular Systolic Function Measured by Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Septic Shock.BioMed research international · 2020Observational
- Current Status of Septic Cardiomyopathy: Basic Science and Clinical Progress.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byResponse.2019
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31511158What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.