Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31511068›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2019

German version of the Death Attitudes Profile- Revised (DAP-GR) - translation and validation of a multidimensional measurement of attitudes towards death.

Jonas Jansen, Christian Schulz-Quach, Nikolett Eisenbeck, David F Carreno, Andrea Schmitz, Rita Fountain, Matthias Franz, Ralf Schäfer, Paul T P Wong, Katharina Fetz

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jonas JansenMedical Faculty, Clinical Institute of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christian Schulz-QuachDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nikolett EisenbeckKaroli Gaspar University of the Reformed Church in Hungary, Budapest, Hungary.
David F CarrenoUniversidad de Almería, Almería, Spain.
Andrea SchmitzLVR Clinic of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic and Psychotherapy for Children and Adolescence, Viersen, Germany.
Rita FountainPsychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care Department, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Matthias FranzMedical Faculty, Clinical Institute of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ralf SchäferMedical Faculty, Clinical Institute of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Paul T P WongThe Meaning Centered Counseling Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Katharina FetzChair of Research Methodology and Statistics, Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany. Katharina.fetz@uni-wh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2391-2243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Germany, only limited data are available on attitudes towards death. Existing measurements are complex and time consuming, and data on psychometric properties are limited. The Death Attitude Profile- Revised (DAP-R) captures attitudes towards dying and death. The measure consists of 32 items, which are assigned to 5 dimensions (Fear of Death, Death Avoidance, Neutral Acceptance, Approach Acceptance, Escape Acceptance). It has been translated and tested in several countries, but no German version exists to date. This study reports the translation of the Death Attitudes Profile-Revised (DAP-R) into German (DAP-GR) using a cross-cultural adaption process methodology and its psychometric assessment.

methodsThe DAP-R was translated following guidelines for cultural adaption. A total of 216 medical students of the Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf participated in this study. Interrater reliability was investigated by means of Kendall's W concordance coefficient. The internal consistency of the DAP-GR Scales was assessed with Cronbach's alpha coefficients. Split-half reliability was estimated using Spearman-Brown coefficients. Convergent validity was measured by Spearman's correlation coefficient. Content validity was assessed by means of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 24 and AMOS 22.

resultsThe items showed fair to good interrater reliability, with W-values ranging from .30 to .79. Internal consistency of the five subscales ranged from .61 (Neutral Acceptance) to .94 (Approach Acceptance). Split-half reliability was good, with a Spearman-Brown-coefficient of .83. The results of CFA slightly diverged from the original scale.

conclusionOur results suggest overall good reliability of the German version of the DAP-R. The DAP-GR promises to be a robust instrument to establish normative data on death attitudes for use in German-speaking countries.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathPsychological TestsAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleGermanyHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsTranslationsYoung AdultCultural adaptionDAP-GRDeath acceptanceDeath anxietyDeath attitude profile-revisedDeath attitudesDenial of deathFactor analysisMultidimensional measureTest constructionValidation

Identifiers

PMID31511068
PMCPMC6740004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.