Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31511038›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2019

Molecular identification and prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in zebu and taurine cattle in North Cameroon.

Babette Abanda, Archile Paguem, Mamoudou Abdoulmoumini, Manchang Tanyi Kingsley, Alfons Renz, Albert Eisenbarth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Molecular identification ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Snapshot Study of the Family Anaplasmataceae,Journal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Seroprevalence ofVeterinary world · 2023
    Article
  15. Dynamics of Infections in Cattle andPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Babette AbandaInstitute of Evolution and Ecology, Department of Comparative Zoology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. guimbangabanda@yahoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4679-2889
Archile PaguemInstitute of Evolution and Ecology, Department of Comparative Zoology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Mamoudou AbdoulmouminiSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Sciences, Department of Parasitology and Parasitological Diseases, University of Ngaoundéré, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon.
Manchang Tanyi KingsleyInstitute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Wakwa Regional Centre, P.O. Box 65, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon.
Alfons RenzInstitute of Evolution and Ecology, Department of Comparative Zoology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Albert EisenbarthInstitute of Evolution and Ecology, Department of Comparative Zoology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Ngaoundéré · CMFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEInstitut de Recherche Agricole pour le Développement · CMUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

Bayer Corporation F-2013BS522Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RE 1536/2-1Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst BA_A/12/ 97080joint RiSC program of the State Ministry of Science, Research and Arts Baden Württemberg and the University of Tübingen 4041002616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic interest for tick-borne pathogens in cattle livestock is rising due to their veterinary and zoonotic importance. Consequently, correct identification of these potential pathogens is crucial to estimate the level of exposition, the risk and the detrimental impact on livestock and the human population.

resultsConventional PCR with generic primers was used to identify groups of tick-borne pathogens in cattle breeds from northern Cameroon. The overall prevalence in 1260 blood samples was 89.1%, with 993 (78.8%) positive for Theileria/Babesia spp., 959 (76.1%) for Anaplasma/Ehrlichia spp., 225 (17.9%) for Borrelia spp., and 180 (14.3%) for Rickettsia spp. Sanger sequencing of a subset of positively-tested samples revealed the presence of Theileria mutans (92.2%, 130/141), T. velifera (16.3%, 23/141), Anaplasma centrale (10.9%, 15/137), A. marginale (30.7%, 42/137), A. platys (51.1%, 70/137), Anaplasma sp. 'Hadesa' (10.9%, 15/137), Ehrlichia ruminantium (0.7%, 1/137), E. canis (0.7%, 1/137), Borrelia theileri (91.3%, 42/46), Rickettsia africae (59.4%, 19/32) and R. felis (12.5%, 4/32). A high level of both intra- and inter-generic co-infections (76.0%) was observed. To the best of our knowledge, B. theileri, T. mutans, T. velifera, A. platys, Anaplasma sp. 'Hadesa', R. felis and E. canis are reported for the first time in cattle from Cameroon, and for R. felis it is the first discovery in the cattle host. Babesia spp. were not detected by sequencing. The highest number of still identifiable species co-infections was up to four pathogens per genus group. Multifactorial analyses revealed a significant association of infection with Borrelia theileri and anemia. Whereas animals of older age had a higher risk of infection, the Gudali cattle had a lower risk compared to the other local breeds.

conclusionCo-infections of tick-borne pathogens with an overall high prevalence were found in all five study sites, and were more likely to occur than single infections. Fulani, Namchi and Kapsiki were the most infected breed in general; however, with regions as significant risk factor. A better-adapted approach for tick-borne pathogen identification in co-infected samples is a requirement for epidemiological investigations and tailored control measures.

Indexed as

AnimalsBabesiaBacteriaBacterial InfectionsCameroonCattleCattle DiseasesCoinfectionPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceProtozoan Infections, AnimalTheileriaTick-Borne DiseasesAnaplasmaBorreliaCameroonCattleEhrlichiaRickettsiaTheileriaTick-borne pathogen

Identifiers

PMID31511038
PMCPMC6737592
OpenAlexW2973101956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.