Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31511012›Full record

Trial reportRadiation oncology (London, England)2019

Skeletal muscle mass correlates with increased toxicity during neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer: A SAKK 75/08 substudy.

Cédric M Panje, Laura Höng, Stefanie Hayoz, Vickie E Baracos, Evelyn Herrmann, Helena Garcia Schüler, Urs R Meier, Guido Henke, Sabina Schacher, Hanne Hawle and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nutritional management during chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Cédric M PanjeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland. cedric.panje@kssg.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6201-8423
Laura HöngDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland.
Stefanie HayozSwiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland.
Vickie E BaracosDivision of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Evelyn HerrmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Helena Garcia SchülerUniversity Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Urs R MeierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Guido HenkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Sabina SchacherDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Hanne HawleSwiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland.
Marie-Aline GérardSwiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland.
Thomas RuhstallerDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ludwig PlasswilmDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)
Swiss Group For Clinical Cancer Research · CHKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHKantonsspital Winterthur · CHLuzerner Kantonsspital · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

research committee of St Gallen Cantonal Hospital MFZ_2015_07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSarcopenia, the critical depletion of skeletal muscle mass, is an independent prognostic factor in several tumor entities for treatment-related toxicity and survival. In esophageal cancer, there have been conflicting results regarding the value of sarcopenia as prognostic factor, which may be attributed to the heterogeneous patient populations and the retrospective nature of previous studies. The aim of our study was therefore to determine the impact of sarcopenia on prospectively collected specific outcomes in a subgroup of patients treated within the phase III study SAKK 75/08 with trimodality therapy (induction chemotherapy, radiochemotherapy and surgery) for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

methodsSarcopenia was assessed by skeletal muscle index at the 3rd lumbar vertebra (L3) in cross-sectional computed tomography scans before induction chemotherapy, before radiochemotherapy and after neoadjuvant therapy in a subgroup of 61 patients from four centers in Switzerland. Sarcopenia was determined by previously established cut-off values (Martin et al., PMID: 23530101) and correlated with prospectively collected outcomes including treatment-related toxicity, postoperative morbidity, treatment feasibility and survival.

resultsUsing the published cut-off values, the prevalence of sarcopenia increased from 29.5% before treatment to 63.9% during neoadjuvant therapy (p < 0.001). Feasibility of neoadjuvant therapy and surgery was not different in initially sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients. We observed in sarcopenic patients significantly increased grade ≥ 3 toxicities during chemoradiation (83.3% vs 52.4%, p = 0.04) and a non-significant trend towards increased postoperative complications (66.7% vs 42.9%, p = 0.16). No difference in survival according to sarcopenia could be observed in this small study population.

conclusionsTrimodality therapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer is feasible in selected patients with sarcopenia. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation increased the percentage of sarcopenia. Sarcopenic patients are at higher risk for increased toxicity during neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and showed a non-significant trend to more postoperative morbidity.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyCross-Sectional StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaEsophagectomyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalNeoadjuvant TherapyCetuximabEsophageal cancerLocally advancedRadiochemotherapyRadiotherapyResectableSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID31511012
PMCPMC6739918
OpenAlexW2973231291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.