Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31511008›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2019

Scaling up eConsult for access to specialists in primary healthcare across four Canadian provinces: study protocol of a multiple case study.

Mylaine Breton, Mélanie Ann Smithman, Clare Liddy, Erin Keely, Gerard Farrell, Alexander Singer, Catherine Lamoureux-Lamarche, Maxine Dumas Pilon, Véronique Nabelsi, Isabelle Gaboury and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Mylaine BretonCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne - Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil Campus, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Office 200, Longueuil, J4K0A8, Canada. mylaine.breton@usherbrooke.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5713-9618
Mélanie Ann SmithmanCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne - Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil Campus, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Office 200, Longueuil, J4K0A8, Canada.
Clare LiddyC.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Center, Bruyère Research Institute, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Erin KeelyDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Division of Endocrinology/Metabolism, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Gerard FarrellDepartment of Family Medicine, Memorial University, St-John, Canada.
Alexander SingerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Catherine Lamoureux-LamarcheCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne - Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil Campus, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Office 200, Longueuil, J4K0A8, Canada.
Maxine Dumas PilonFamily Medicine Center, St-Mary's Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Véronique NabelsiDépartement des sciences administratives, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Canada.
Isabelle GabouryCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne - Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil Campus, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Office 200, Longueuil, J4K0A8, Canada.
Marie-Pierre GagnonFaculté des sciences infirmières, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Carolyn Steele GrayBridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum, Research Institute, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Canada.
Jay ShawWomen's College Hospital, Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, Canada.
Catherine HudonCentre de recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Kris Aubrey-BasslerDepartment of Family Medicine, Memorial University, St-John, Canada.
Justin GagnonDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Élizabeth Côté-BoileauCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne - Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil Campus, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Office 200, Longueuil, J4K0A8, Canada.
Paula Louise BushDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research #402867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanada has been referred to as the land of 'perpetual pilot projects'. Effective innovations often remain small in scale, with limited impact on health systems. Several innovations have been developed in Canada to tackle important challenges such as poor access to services and excessive wait times - one of the most promising innovations that has been piloted is eConsult, which is a model of asynchronous communication that allows primary care providers to electronically consult with specialists regarding their patients' medical issues. eConsult pilot projects have been shown to reduce wait times for specialist care, prevent unnecessary referrals and reduce health system costs. eConsult has been spread throughout Ontario as well as to certain regions in Manitoba, Quebec, and Newfoundland and Labrador. Our aim is to understand and support the scale-up process of eConsult in Ontario, Quebec, Manitoba, and Newfoundland and Labrador. Our specific objectives are to (1) describe the main components of eConsult relevant to the scale-up process in each province; (2) understand the eConsult scale-up process in each province and compare across provinces; (3) identify policy issues and strategies to scaling up eConsult in each province; and (4) foster cross-level and cross-jurisdictional learning on scaling up eConsult.

methodsWe will conduct a qualitative multiple case study to investigate the scaling up of eConsult in four Canadian provinces using a grey literature review, key stakeholder interviews (10 interviews/province), non-participant observations, focus groups and deliberative dialogues. We will identify the main components of eConsult to be scaled up using logic models (obj. 1). Scaling up processes will be analysed using strategies adapted from process research (obj. 2). Policy issues and strategies to scale-up eConsult will be analysed thematically (obj. 3). Finally, a symposium will foster pan-Canadian learning on the process of scaling up eConsult (obj. 4). DISCUSSION: This study will likely increase learning and support evidence-based policy-making across participating provinces and may improve the capacity for a pan-Canadian scale-up of eConsult, including in provinces where eConsult has not yet been implemented. This work is essential to inform how similar innovations can reshape our health systems in the evolving information age.

Indexed as

SpecializationCanadaHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services ResearchHumansPrimary Health CareProgram DevelopmentReferral and ConsultationRemote ConsultationAccess to healthcarediffusion of innovationeConsultelectronic consultationimplementationpolicyprimary careprocess researchscaling up

Identifiers

PMID31511008
PMCPMC6739985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.