Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31511003›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2019

Prevalence and clinical associations of wheezes and crackles in the general population: the Tromsø study.

J C Aviles-Solis, C Jácome, A Davidsen, R Einarsen, S Vanbelle, H Pasterkamp, H Melbye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Associations with antibiotic prescribing for acute exacerbation of COPD in primary care: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Trial
  2. Chest auscultation - tradition and expectationsScandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

J C Aviles-SolisGeneral Practice Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine, UIT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. juan.c.solis@uit.no.
C JácomeCINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
A DavidsenGeneral Practice Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine, UIT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
R EinarsenGeneral Practice Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine, UIT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
S VanbelleDepartment of methodology and statistics, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
H PasterkampDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
H MelbyeGeneral Practice Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine, UIT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
UiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOMaastricht University · NLUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWheezes and crackles are well-known signs of lung diseases, but can also be heard in apparently healthy adults. However, their prevalence in a general population has been sparsely described. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of wheezes and crackles in a large general adult population and explore associations with self-reported disease, smoking status and lung function.

methodsWe recorded lung sounds in 4033 individuals 40 years or older and collected information on self-reported disease. Pulse oximetry and spirometry were carried out. We estimated age-standardized prevalence of wheezes and crackles and associations between wheezes and crackles and variables of interest were analyzed with univariable and multivariable logistic regressions.

resultsTwenty-eight percent of individuals had wheezes or crackles. The age-standardized prevalence of wheezes was 18.6% in women and 15.3% in men, and of crackles, 10.8 and 9.4%, respectively. Wheezes were mostly found during expiration and crackles during inspiration. Significant predictors of expiratory wheezes in multivariable analyses were age (10 years increase - OR 1.18, 95%CI 1.09-1.30), female gender (1.45, 1.2-1.8), self-reported asthma (1.36, 1.00-1.83), and current smoking (1.70, 1.28-2.23). The most important predictors of inspiratory crackles were age (1.76, 1.57-1.99), current smoking, (1.94, 1.40-2.69), mMRC ≥2 (1.79, 1.18-2.65), SpO

conclusionsNearly over a quarter of adults present adventitious lung sounds on auscultation. Age was the most important predictor of adventitious sounds, particularly crackles. The adventitious sounds were also associated with self-reported disease, current smoking and measures of lung function. The presence of findings in two or more auscultation sites was associated with a higher risk of decreased lung function than solitary findings.

Indexed as

ExhalationInhalationRespiratory SoundsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionAuscultationCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLung DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedAuscultationCracklesPopulationWheezes

Identifiers

PMID31511003
PMCPMC6739986
OpenAlexW2972539368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.