Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31510979›Full record

Observational studyBMC medical education2019

Long-term retention assessment after simulation-based-training of pediatric procedural skills among adult emergency physicians: a multicenter observational study.

Raihei Ansquer, Thomas Mesnier, Farnam Farampour, Denis Oriot, Daniel Aiham Ghazali

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Simulation in airway management teaching and training.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raihei AnsquerEmergency Department and EMS, University Hospital of Poitiers, 86000, Poitiers, France.
Thomas MesnierEmergency Department and EMS, General Hospital of Angouleme, 16000, Angouleme, France.
Farnam FarampourEmergency Department and EMS, General Hospital of Niort, Niort, France.
Denis OriotPediatric Emergency Department, University Hospital of Poitiers, 86000, Poitiers, France.
Daniel Aiham GhazaliEmergency Department and EMS, University Hospital of Bichat and Beaujon, Paris, France. aiham@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0129-4322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the primary goals of simulation-based education is to enable long-term retention of training gains. However, medical literature has poorly contributed to understanding the best timing for repetition of simulation sessions. There is heterogeneity in re-training recommendations.

objectivesThis study assessed, through simulation-based training in different groups, the long-term retention of rare pediatric technical procedures.

methodsThis multicenter observational study included 107 emergency physicians and residents. Eighty-eight were divided into four groups that were specifically trained for pediatric emergency procedures at different points in time between 2010 and 2015 (< 0.5 year prior for G1, between 0.5 and 2 years prior for G2, between 2 and 4 years prior for G3, and ≥ 4 years prior for G4). An untrained control group (C) included 19 emergency physicians. Participants were asked to manage an unconscious infant using a low-fidelity mannequin. Assessment was based on the performance at 6 specific tasks corresponding to airway (A) and ventilation (B) skills. The performance (scored on 100) was evaluated by the TAPAS scale (Team Average Performance Assessment Scale). Correlation between performance and clinical level of experience was studied.

resultsThere was a significant difference in performance between groups (p < 0.0001). For G1, 89% of the expected tasks were completed but resulted in longer delays before initiating actions than for the other groups. There was no difference between G4 and C with less than half of the tasks performed (47 and 43% respectively, p = 0.57). There was no correlation between clinical level of experience and performance (p = 0.39).

conclusionPerformance decreased at 6 months after specific training for pediatric emergency skills, with total loss at 4 years after training, irrespective of experience. Repetition of simulation sessions should be implemented frequently after training to improve long-term retention and the optimal rate of refresher courses requires further research.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, ContinuingPhysiciansSimulation TrainingAdultChildClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency MedicineFemaleHumansInfantInternship and ResidencyMaleTask Performance and AnalysisAssessmentEducationEmergency medicineLong-term memoryPediatric emergencyPerformanceSimulation-based educationTechnical skillsTraining

Identifiers

PMID31510979
PMCPMC6739955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.